This article addresses the temporary measures on the merits, to the author this is a hybrid concept within the Peruvian procedural system. to explain this procedural notion, the author begins alluding to the differentiated tutelage and, within it, the self-help measures; then he refers to the procedural stage where the temporary measures on the merits should be placed and also makes a comparison between precautionary measures and self-help measures to conclude that the temporary measures on the merits must be treated as self-help measures.

No presenta resumen

This article addresses the temporary measures on the merits, to the author this is a hybrid concept within the Peruvian procedural system. to explain this procedural notion, the author begins alluding to the differentiated tutelage and, within it, the self-help measures; then he refers to the procedural stage where the temporary measures on the merits should be placed and also makes a comparison between precautionary measures and self-help measures to conclude that the temporary measures on the merits must be treated as self-help measures.

El presente artículo aborda el tema de la fijación de los puntos controvertidos durante la etapa Postulatoria, los cuales a juicio del autor permitirán definir los lineamientos del proceso y concretamente la posterior etapa Probatoria. Para lograrlo, el autor  sostiene que es necesario un correcto saneamiento del proceso, interpretando las pretensiones y contrapretensiones de las partes con el fin de determinar si hay un conflicto de intereses que genere incertidumbre jurídica. De esta forma, el juez se aleja de particularidades que no forman parte del fondo de la litis. This article addresses the issue of fixing controversial points during the stage of pleadings, which allow defining the process guidelines and specifically the subsequent Evidentiary Stage. to achieve this, the author submits that it is necessary to a proper sanitation of the process, by interpreting the claims and ...

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El presente artículo aborda el tema de la fijación de los puntos controvertidos durante la etapa Postulatoria, los cuales a juicio del autor permitirán definir los lineamientos del proceso y concretamente la posterior etapa Probatoria. Para lograrlo, el autor  sostiene que es necesario un correcto saneamiento del proceso, interpretando las pretensiones y contrapretensiones de las partes con el fin de determinar si hay un conflicto de intereses que genere incertidumbre jurídica. De esta forma, el juez se aleja de particularidades que no forman parte del fondo de la litis. This article addresses the issue of fixing controversial points during the stage of pleadings, which allow defining the process guidelines and specifically the subsequent Evidentiary Stage. to achieve this, the author submits that it is necessary to a proper sanitation of the process, by interpreting the claims and ...

Este artículo analiza la sociedad peruana y los cambios sufridos en la identidad nacional y el deterioro moral iniciado en la segunda mitad del siglo XX que afecta la figura del magistrado y del Poder Judicial.  Se plantea la necesidad de una reinstitucionalización del Poder Judicial, sobre la base de dos estructuras: legal y orgánica. Propone que la política judicial sea parte del debate nacional, y que se consideren aspectos como, la independencia de la función jurisdiccional, y su desarrollo democrático

El artículo no presenta resumen.

This brief provides thoughts on the model of the Peruvian Judicial system, as a member of a democratic system of a wider spectrum that requires solid bases for its institutionalization. We address the weaknesses of the system which continues to exist despite the personal efforts of some judges directing this process over the last few years. Although we have developed the method to identify judicial systems in other protocols, we believe that since it aims to provide a political view of the judicial system in Peru, the purpose of this paper now requires their definition in a political context

This article justify theoretically, the utility of the judicial associationism like one of the components of the doctrine of Democratic Justice. This one, although is developed from the new social molds, includes a series of manifestations that are transformed into rights that the citizens exert so that the State guarantees justice released from any Legal Positivism that was limited and undefined of the expires social justice; that manage in a scene of classes, not always equitable. For that reason, the necessity to justify the judicial associationism,obeys to these new tendencies, transform a social ideology, and fortify it in a Constitutional Governmen

El presente artículo aborda el tema de la fijación de los puntos controvertidos durante la etapa Postulatoria, los cuales a juicio del autor permitirán definir los lineamientos del proceso y concretamente la posterior etapa Probatoria. Para lograrlo, el autor  sostiene que es necesario un correcto saneamiento del proceso, interpretando las pretensiones y contrapretensiones de las partes con el fin de determinar si hay un conflicto de intereses que genere incertidumbre jurídica. De esta forma, el juez se aleja de particularidades que no forman parte del fondo de la litis. This article addresses the issue of fixing controversial points during the stage of pleadings, which allow defining the process guidelines and specifically the subsequent Evidentiary Stage. to achieve this, the author submits that it is necessary to a proper sanitation of the process, by interpreting the claims and ...

This article addresses the temporary measures on the merits, to the author this is a hybrid concept within the Peruvian procedural system. to explain this procedural notion, the author begins alluding to the differentiated tutelage and, within it, the self-help measures; then he refers to the procedural stage where the temporary measures on the merits should be placed and also makes a comparison between precautionary measures and self-help measures to conclude that the temporary measures on the merits must be treated as self-help measures.

Este artículo analiza la sociedad peruana y los cambios sufridos en la identidad nacional y el deterioro moral iniciado en la segunda mitad del siglo XX que afecta la figura del magistrado y del Poder Judicial.  Se plantea la necesidad de una reinstitucionalización del Poder Judicial, sobre la base de dos estructuras: legal y orgánica. Propone que la política judicial sea parte del debate nacional, y que se consideren aspectos como, la independencia de la función jurisdiccional, y su desarrollo democrático

This brief provides thoughts on the model of the Peruvian Judicial system, as a member of a democratic system of a wider spectrum that requires solid bases for its institutionalization. We address the weaknesses of the system which continues to exist despite the personal efforts of some judges directing this process over the last few years. Although we have developed the method to identify judicial systems in other protocols, we believe that since it aims to provide a political view of the judicial system in Peru, the purpose of this paper now requires their definition in a political context

This article justify theoretically, the utility of the judicial associationism like one of the components of the doctrine of Democratic Justice. This one, although is developed from the new social molds, includes a series of manifestations that are transformed into rights that the citizens exert so that the State guarantees justice released from any Legal Positivism that was limited and undefined of the expires social justice; that manage in a scene of classes, not always equitable. For that reason, the necessity to justify the judicial associationism,obeys to these new tendencies, transform a social ideology, and fortify it in a Constitutional Governmen

La prueba de oficio en el proceso civil responde a la necesidad de arribar a la máxima aproximación de certeza de las premisas planteadas por las partes. La aporta el juez cuando este advierte la ausencia de un medio de prueba que es necesario para resolver el conflicto, pero que las partes no han podido impulsar. Antes de ello, el juez debe realizar el ejercicio de extraer el conocimiento contenido en los medios probatorios que sí se han podido actuar y relacionarlos para adquirir un conocimiento único que implique la conclusión del proceso. Solo cuando no es posible extraer ese conocimiento único mediante la valoración conjunta de los medios de prueba, el juez impulsará la prueba de oficio. El presente trabajo desarrolla el pensamiento de Perfecto Andrés Ibáñez, jurista y juez español, quien trata este mecanismo de la prueba de oficio como una inducción al proceso, un cono...

Ell autor desarrolla los elementos previos a la fijación de la controversia, las características, los elementos y las formas del saneamiento procesal para fijar la controversia, así como la base legal en esta etapa del proceso, Finalmente el autor expone que la práctica jurisdiccional en el sistema procesal peruano ha deformado este tema, hasta tenerlo casi como un requisito formal de repetir las pretensiones y contra pretensiones.

NO TIENE