No description

No presenta resumen

No description

Esta propuesta de investigación busca responder cómo se refleja la competencia entre Estados Unidos y China en la Política Exterior Peruana. Competencia que, según diversos autores, no es nueva, pero se ha tornado más conflictiva en los últimos años. Asimismo, la propuesta de investigación centra el análisis durante los años 2011-2018, debido a que desde el gobierno de Ollanta Humala la relación con China adquiere un sentido político (con las Asociaciones Estratégicas), y no solo económico (con la firma del Tratado de Libre Comercio o TLC). Asimismo, el 2018 es el año en que Perú forma parte del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU como miembro no permanente, lo que permite mostrar a Perú su posición sobre temas de relevancia internacional. La hipótesis planteada en la investigación es que la competencia entre Estados Unidos y China se refleja en tres áreas: económica/com...

Esta propuesta de investigación busca responder cómo se refleja la competencia entre Estados Unidos y China en la Política Exterior Peruana. Competencia que, según diversos autores, no es nueva, pero se ha tornado más conflictiva en los últimos años. Asimismo, la propuesta de investigación centra el análisis durante los años 2011-2018, debido a que desde el gobierno de Ollanta Humala la relación con China adquiere un sentido político (con las Asociaciones Estratégicas), y no solo económico (con la firma del Tratado de Libre Comercio o TLC). Asimismo, el 2018 es el año en que Perú forma parte del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU como miembro no permanente, lo que permite mostrar a Perú su posición sobre temas de relevancia internacional. La hipótesis planteada en la investigación es que la competencia entre Estados Unidos y China se refleja en tres áreas: económica/com...

No presenta resumen

No description

The strength of the indigenous movement in Ecuador has proven itself, since the change of century, to be capable of shaping national politics through social pressure and mobilization. From massive protests that toppled presidents, to candidates strategically aligning with CONAIE, the indigenous movement has been consolidated as a central political actor in Ecuador. Nonetheless, the trajectory of its political stances and actions has not been stable, and this variation seems to be explained by the movement’s relationship vis-a-vis the government in office. The present article will briefly go over the governments of Gutiérrez, Correa and Moreno (up to 2019) to establish theoretical frameworks in which the demands of the indigenous movement can be classified, to be able to identify the reasoning behind the different courses of action and incentives for mobilization. Particularly, the ana...

The strength of the indigenous movement in Ecuador has proven itself, since the change of century, to be capable of shaping national politics through social pressure and mobilization. From massive protests that toppled presidents, to candidates strategically aligning with CONAIE, the indigenous movement has been consolidated as a central political actor in Ecuador. Nonetheless, the trajectory of its political stances and actions has not been stable, and this variation seems to be explained by the movement’s relationship vis-a-vis the government in office. The present article will briefly go over the governments of Gutiérrez, Correa and Moreno (up to 2019) to establish theoretical frameworks in which the demands of the indigenous movement can be classified, to be able to identify the reasoning behind the different courses of action and incentives for mobilization. Particularly, the ana...

No description

The strength of the indigenous movement in Ecuador has proven itself, since the change of century, to be capable of shaping national politics through social pressure and mobilization. From massive protests that toppled presidents, to candidates strategically aligning with CONAIE, the indigenous movement has been consolidated as a central political actor in Ecuador. Nonetheless, the trajectory of its political stances and actions has not been stable, and this variation seems to be explained by the movement’s relationship vis-a-vis the government in office. The present article will briefly go over the governments of Gutiérrez, Correa and Moreno (up to 2019) to establish theoretical frameworks in which the demands of the indigenous movement can be classified, to be able to identify the reasoning behind the different courses of action and incentives for mobilization. Particularly, the ana...