No presenta resumen.

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen

This article examines the inclusion of anticorruption clauses in Peruvian state contracts introduced following the Lava Jato case in 2017.These clauses seek to ensure integrity by requiring contractors to declare that they have not engaged in corrupt acts and to adopt preventive measures.However, their application in contracts with consortia generates conflicts, since each member must assume joint liability for violations by others.Differences are explored between concession contracts, which require a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), and license contracts, where the consortium maintains its legal autonomy, highlighting the need for a consistent application of these clauses to respect the associative structure and liability rules.

No presenta resumen

No description

No description

No description

Criminal Compliance is an emerging issue in Peru, since its development and implementation in Law 30424 in 2016. And it is due to such premature condition that after years of its enactment, certain deficiencies can be observed in the results obtained.That is why the author, in this article is responsible for analyzing the regulation, along with the development and implementation of the same in this period. It raises the different theoretical points that affect the usefulness of the regulations, and that represent the need for a reform that provides the necessary tools to legal entities for a correct implementation of criminal compliance.

As a consequence of the 2007 financial crisis, companies have been focusing on managing the risks of normative infringement as an integral part of the notion of a business risk. This practice is encouraged by the implementation of normative with cross-border effects and reach, as well as by the growing internal regulations of autonomous criminal liability of corporate bodies systems.In the context of the circumstances described, in the present article the author analyzes: (i) the practical performance of the Criminal Compliance programs; (ii) their minimum content to exonerate or mitigate the criminal liability of the corporate bodies involved in a crime or offence; and, (iii) the challenges for the lawyer specialized in Criminal Law that this new approach of criminal preventingcounseling enforces.

This article examines the inclusion of anticorruption clauses in Peruvian state contracts, introduced following the Lava Jato case in 2017.These clauses seek to ensure integrity by requiring contractors to declare that they have not engaged in corrupt acts and to adopt preventive measures.However, their application in contracts with consortia generates conflicts, since each member must assume joint liability for violations by others.Differences are explored between concession contracts, which require a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), and license contracts, where the consortium maintains its legal autonomy, highlighting the need for a consistent application of these clauses to respect the associative structure and liability rules.

Voluntary desistance represents a complex issue in criminal dogmatics. In this context, the author argues that impunity for voluntary desistance, regulated in legal systems such as German, Spanish and Peruvian, lacks a solid foundation and instead generates dysfunctional consequences in any legal-criminal system that seeks to protect individual autonomy. Consequently, in a legal system where individual autonomy is a fundamental principle, the ability of an individual to avoid criminal liability simply by voluntarily desisting from a criminal act already initiated, without consideration of the risk created, is contrary to the logic of a criminal system that seeks to safeguard social security and order. It is therefore proposed that the rules be reformed in such a way that voluntary desistance does not automatically exempt from criminal liability. This would allow for a balance to be struc...

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

No description

El presente artículo delimita el ámbito de protección del delito de insider trading -abuso de información privilegiada en el Mercado de Valores-, partiendo de un recuento histórico que nos permite conocer cómo y por qué surge la necesidad de tipificarlo como delito. En este sentido se reseñan los graves perjuicios económicos que pueden sufrir los inversores y,con ellos, el propio mercado de valores, lo que puede alterar las estructuras del modelo de la Economía de Libre Mercado consagrado en el artículo 58 de la Constitución Política del Perú.

Luego de la crisis financiera de 2007, las empresas vienen ocupándose de gestionar los riesgos por incumplimientos normativos como parte integrante de la noción de riesgo de negocio. Esta práctica es incentivada tanto por la aplicación de normas de alcance transfronterizo como por las crecientes regulaciones internas de sistemas de responsabilidad penal autónoma de personas jurídicas.A propósito de esta coyuntura, en el presente artículo se analiza: (i) el rendimiento práctico de los programas de Criminal Compliance; (ii) su contenido mínimo para exonerar o atenuar la responsabilidad penal de las empresas incursas en algúndelito; y, (iii) los retos que para el abogado penalista impone este nuevo enfoque de asesoramiento preventivo empresarial.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El presente artículo delimita el ámbito de protección del delito de insider trading -abuso de información privilegiada en el Mercado de Valores-, partiendo de un recuento histórico que nos permite conocer cómo y por qué surge la necesidad de tipificarlo como delito. En este sentido se reseñan los graves perjuicios económicos que pueden sufrir los inversores y,con ellos, el propio mercado de valores, lo que puede alterar las estructuras del modelo de la Economía de Libre Mercado consagrado en el artículo 58 de la Constitución Política del Perú.