La investigación analizó el vínculo entre autoeficacia académica, procrastinación y ansiedad en estudiantes universitarios peruanos durante la pandemia. Se empleó un enfoque explicativo y un diseño no experimental, encuestando a 297 estudiantes. Los datos se recopilaron mediante cuestionarios virtuales y escalas específicas. Los resultados mostraron que la autoeficacia académica tenía un impacto negativo en la procrastinación (β = -0.507; p < 0.01) y en la ansiedad general (β = -0.218; p < 0.01). A su vez, la procrastinación tenía un efecto positivo en la ansiedad general (β = 0.114; p < 0.01). En resumen, niveles más altos de autoeficacia académica se asociaron con menos procrastinación y ansiedad, lo que sugiere que una autoeficacia adecuada puede mitigar la procrastinación y la ansiedad, mejorando así el rendimiento estudiantil durante situaciones de alto estrés.

“Currently, social anomie is a public health problem worldwide since people show behavior that does not conform to the newly established norms. Faced with this, the aim of the study was to develop and validate the psychometric properties of a short scale to assess social anomie in a sample of 406 adults (48% male and 52% female) between the ages of 18 and 62. Validity was evaluated based on internal structure through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability through the internal consistency method with the hierarchical omega coefficient. The results indicate that a bi-factor model presents better indexes of adjustment to the data (χ2=62.86; df=25; p=.000; RMSEA=.061 [IC90% .042-.080]; SRMR=.024; CFI=.99; TLI=.99). Furthermore, the bi-factor model presents adequate levels of reliability for the general factor (ωH=.70) and for the affective (ωhs=.32) and behavior (ωhs=.41) d...

“Currently, social anomie is a public health problem worldwide since people show behavior that does not conform to the newly established norms. Faced with this, the aim of the study was to develop and validate the psychometric properties of a short scale to assess social anomie in a sample of 406 adults (48% male and 52% female) between the ages of 18 and 62. Validity was evaluated based on internal structure through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability through the internal consistency method with the hierarchical omega coefficient. The results indicate that a bi-factor model presents better indexes of adjustment to the data (χ2=62.86; df=25; p=.000; RMSEA=.061 [IC90% .042-.080]; SRMR=.024; CFI=.99; TLI=.99). Furthermore, the bi-factor model presents adequate levels of reliability for the general factor (ωH=.70) and for the affective (ωhs=.32) and behavior (ωhs=.41) d...