Este informe analiza la sentencia dictada en el marco de un proceso de anulación de laudo a través del cual la ex concesionaria del proyecto de “Red Dorsal Nacional de Fibra Óptica” buscaba que se anulen dos laudos: uno parcial, a través del cual el tribunal arbitral se declaró competente para conocer la controversia, pese a que aquella alegó que no lo era porque la materia se encontraba sometida a competencia exclusiva del regulador en telecomunicaciones y, un laudo final, mediante el cual el tribunal amparó las pretensiones de la demandante, una empresa de distribución eléctrica. Es materia de este trabajo evaluar las competencias del regulador en telecomunicaciones en su función de solución de controversias, así como estudiar la arbitrabilidad de la materia que fue sometida a arbitraje y la causal de anulación de laudo por inarbitrabilidad manifiesta (recogida en el i...

One of the great similarities between an ordinary judicial process and arbitration is that both take time. However, in arbitration, unlike in court proceedings, certain measures provided are intended to respond to an adequate use of this resource in the process. In general terms, the current legal standards for granting extensions in arbitration are the equality of arms or opportunities and the reasonableness, both duly recognized in the Peruvian Arbitration Law. In this article, the authors review the sufficiency of this standard from the perspective of an economic analysis for each of the phases of the arbitration process and, in this way, propose its use as an approach for the evaluation of reasonableness when having to decide whether to grant an extension in an ongoing process.

One of the great similarities between an ordinary judicial process and arbitration is that both take time. However, in arbitration, unlike in court proceedings, certain measures provided are intended to respond to an adequate use of this resource in the process. In general terms, the current legal standards for granting extensions in arbitration are the equality of arms or opportunities and the reasonableness, both duly recognized in the Peruvian Arbitration Law. In this article, the authors review the sufficiency of this standard from the perspective of an economic analysis for each of the phases of the arbitration process and, in this way, propose its use as an approach for the evaluation of reasonableness when having to decide whether to grant an extension in an ongoing process.

One of the great similarities between an ordinary judicial process and arbitration is that both take time. However, in arbitration, unlike in court proceedings, certain measures provided are intended to respond to an adequate use of this resource in the process. In general terms, the current legal standards for granting extensions in arbitration are the equality of arms or opportunities and the reasonableness, both duly recognized in the Peruvian Arbitration Law. In this article, the authors review the sufficiency of this standard from the perspective of an economic analysis for each of the phases of the arbitration process and, in this way, propose its use as an approach for the evaluation of reasonableness when having to decide whether to grant an extension in an ongoing process.