No description

This work contains the author's paper prepared for the International Congress of Philosophy and is presented as a pioneer in the field of legal logic. The author refers that the word "logic" must be redefined to include the norm in its content. He proposes the notions of "logic of being" and "logic of duty to be" to differentiate the logic of propositions from the logic of norms. In this sense, the author argues that the logic of norms is linked to the duty to be, since norms prescribe behavioral patterns. Likewise, the author analyzes the understanding of legal logic and propositional logic as isomorphic and the implications of such action. Finally, the article includes the author's reflections on this paper and his current views on legal logic.

This article focuses its analysis on the rational nature of philosophy and its importance in the understanding and justifying human rights. In this context, the author discusses the search for definitive solutions in philosophy, its distinction from science, and the role of evidence and logical deduction in knowledge foundation. He also addresses the complexity of normative and propositional evidence and their implications for the human rights grounding . The article continues with an examination on this topic, and distinguishes between absolute and relative grounding. Given that an absolute grounding is unlikely due to the less universal nature of normative evidence, as opposed to propositional evidence, it proposes a relative grounding, based on the hypothesis of rational behavior, where respect for freedom and rights arises from the necessity of non-arbitrary behavior in society. Fina...

Páginas 214-220

Se reúnen diferentes estudios de especialistas de diversos, en homenaje a Jorge Basadre. Múltiple es su quehacer historiográfico y cultural, Jorge Basadre representa no sólo un punto de partida para la actual historia moderna del Perú, sino que su Historia de la República del Perú significa una reconocida realización, Basadre ha incursionado en numerosos y diferentes campos, abriendo rutas intelectuales transitadas después asiduamente en la investigación y la tarea siempre urgente de escribir la historia del Perú.

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen

No contiene resumen

No description

This article focuses its analysis on the rational nature of philosophy and its importance in the understanding and justifying human rights. In this context, the author discusses the search for definitive solutions in philosophy, its distinction from science, and the role of evidence and logical deduction in knowledge foundation. He also addresses the complexity of normative and propositional evidence and their implications for the human rights grounding . The article continues with an examination on this topic, and distinguishes between absolute and relative grounding. Given that an absolute grounding is unlikely due to the less universal nature of normative evidence, as opposed to propositional evidence, it proposes a relative grounding, based on the hypothesis of rational behavior, where respect for freedom and rights arises from the necessity of non-arbitrary behavior in society. Fina...

This work contains the author's paper prepared for the International Congress of Philosophy and is presented as a pioneer in the field of legal logic. The author refers that the word "logic" must be redefined to include the norm in its content. He proposes the notions of "logic of being" and "logic of duty to be" to differentiate the logic of propositions from the logic of norms. In this sense, the author argues that the logic of norms is linked to the duty to be, since norms prescribe behavioral patterns. Likewise, the author analyzes the understanding of legal logic and propositional logic as isomorphic and the implications of such action. Finally, the article includes the author's reflections on this paper and his current views on legal logic.

Resumen