Main objective was to determine the effects of motivational configuration (CM) of the teacher and the student in group and individual levels, on classroom motivational climate (CMC), attributed motivation and satisfaction with the teacher (MASP) and estimated performance (RE). The data of 1,022 secondary students and 50 Bolivian teachers were analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. The CM of students and teachers was explained by motivational school climate, expectations of self-efficacy, goal orientation and beliefs about learning, knowledge and authority. The CM of the teacher had no impact on CMC, MASP and RE, but that of the student, especially the group level, which reflects common elements among the students of each class.

Main objective was to determine the effects of motivational configuration (CM) of the teacher and the student in group and individual levels, on classroom motivational climate (CMC), attributed motivation and satisfaction with the teacher (MASP) and estimated performance (RE). The data of 1,022 secondary students and 50 Bolivian teachers were analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. The CM of students and teachers was explained by motivational school climate, expectations of self-efficacy, goal orientation and beliefs about learning, knowledge and authority. The CM of the teacher had no impact on CMC, MASP and RE, but that of the student, especially the group level, which reflects common elements among the students of each class.

Main objective was to determine the effects of motivational configuration (CM) of the teacher and the student in group and individual levels, on classroom motivational climate (CMC), attributed motivation and satisfaction with the teacher (MASP) and estimated performance (RE). The data of 1,022 secondary students and 50 Bolivian teachers were analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. The CM of students and teachers was explained by motivational school climate, expectations of self-efficacy, goal orientation and beliefs about learning, knowledge and authority. The CM of the teacher had no impact on CMC, MASP and RE, but that of the student, especially the group level, which reflects common elements among the students of each class.

This study proposed the design of three brief scales coherent with and contributing to the pedagogical perspective of schoolteachers, aiming to enhance self-regulated learning and psychological well-being of students. With the participation of teachers and other professionals who provided feedback throughout the process, scales for school motivation (ME), frustration tolerance (TF), and school satisfaction (SE) were designed and validated among 1260 students from 7th to 12th grade (57.7% female, mean age M=14.9 years, SD=1.9) belonging to three educational institutions in northern Chile. Descriptive, correlational, reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) measures obtained indicated adequate psychometric behavior in all scales. As a result of the validation process, the report indicates that the instruments meet psychometric criteria for application in the school context and c...