No presenta resumen

In Peru, the awareness of corporate social responsibility (CSR), at least at the level of discourse, occupies a significant space. Therefore, it is extremely important to evaluate its implementation in view of its economic and social reality. Thus, in this paper the state of the art is presented along with some important criticisms of CSR and its broader notion: corporate sustainability (parts I to IV). For this reason, the author throughout the text will explore different definitions of CSR that encompass various mathematical formulations used in economics. Added to this, it will refer to the concepts held by Professor Francisco Durand regarding the different economies in Peru. Then, the discursive model is contrasted with the Peruvian reality to conclude that, as things are, the only model of corporate social responsibility is the Friedmannian one (profitability).

En nuestro país, la conciencia de la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC), al menos a nivel del discurso, ocupa un espacio significativo. Por ello, resulta de suma importancia evaluar su puesta en práctica en atención a su realidad económica y social. Así, en este trabajo presentamos el estado del arte junto con algunas críticas importantes sobre la RSC y su noción más amplia: la sostenibilidad corporativa (partes I al IV). Luego pasamos a contrastar el modelo discursivo con la realidad peruana para concluir que, tal y como están las cosas, el único modelo de responsabilidad social corporativa es el friedmaniano (rentabilidad), y explicamos las razones de esta conclusión (parte V).

In this paper we attack horn 2 of the Jørgensen’s dilemma (prohibitive thesis), so we enforce horn1 (permissive thesis). Also, we explore partially the idea of a syntactical solution for a logic of imperatives based on the fact of the lack of truth value of imperatives.

In Peru, the awareness of corporate social responsibility (CSR), at least at the level of discourse, occupies a significant space. Therefore, it is extremely important to evaluate its implementation in view of its economic and social reality. Thus, in this paper the state of the art is presented along with some important criticisms of CSR and its broader notion: corporate sustainability (parts I to IV). For this reason, the author throughout the text will explore different definitions of CSR that encompass various mathematical formulations used in economics. Added to this, it will refer to the concepts held by Professor Francisco Durand regarding the different economies in Peru. Then, the discursive model is contrasted with the Peruvian reality to conclude that, as things are, the only model of corporate social responsibility is the Friedmannian one (profitability).

In this paper we attack horn 2 of the Jørgensen’s dilemma (prohibitive thesis), so we enforce horn1 (permissive thesis). Also, we explore partially the idea of a syntactical solution for a logic of imperatives based on the fact of the lack of truth value of imperatives.