The digital transformation is reaching the individual and society in all its magnitude. Identity is an element that relates the first to the second, allows people to interact with each other within society and makes it possible to establish all kinds of relationships with people, organisations, the State, etc. These facets are developing within the environment of digital transformation and are therefore generating different forms of digital identity. We find them in the exercise of fundamental rights, our official documentation, judicial decisions, modern technologies, social networks, and we will see them develop in greater number and depth. This work bears witness to the variants that digital identity is taking on, and proposes a reflection on the criteria that will allow us to understand future aspects of the digitalisation of our identity.

La comunicación judicial lucía problemas y la pandemia del Covid-19 la interrumpió totalmente el 16 de marzo del 2020. El Poder Judicial tuvo que ingresar al entorno digital para buscar opciones y encontró algo. Un proyecto piloto de comunicación digital había sido aprobado el 10 de setiembre del 2019 para algunos juzgados de la Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima. Sus autoridades no tardaron en oficializarlo para toda esa corte el 16 de junio del 2020. Rápidamente, las máximas autoridades del Poder Judicial dispusieron su empleo obligatorio en todos los órganos jurisdiccionales del país el 19 de marzo del 2021. Nos referimos al aplicativo digital “El juez te escucha”. Nuestra investigación analiza los aportes de dicho aplicativo a la comunicación entre el Poder Judicial y los ciudadanos, en cuanto al ejercicio de los derechos de estos y respecto a la gestión de la atenci...

La comunicación judicial lucía problemas y la pandemia del Covid-19 la interrumpió totalmente el 16 de marzo del 2020. El Poder Judicial tuvo que ingresar al entorno digital para buscar opciones y encontró algo. Un proyecto piloto de comunicación digital había sido aprobado el 10 de setiembre del 2019 para algunos juzgados de la Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima. Sus autoridades no tardaron en oficializarlo para toda esa corte el 16 de junio del 2020. Rápidamente, las máximas autoridades del Poder Judicial dispusieron su empleo obligatorio en todos los órganos jurisdiccionales del país el 19 de marzo del 2021. Nos referimos al aplicativo digital “El juez te escucha”. Nuestra investigación analiza los aportes de dicho aplicativo a la comunicación entre el Poder Judicial y los ciudadanos, en cuanto al ejercicio de los derechos de estos y respecto a la gestión de la atenci...

El presente trabajo “Alcances del proceso contencioso administrativo urgente”, analiza el vacío normativo del proceso contencioso administrativo urgente frente a las actuaciones de la administración relacionadas a un reglamento y su incidencia en el derecho constitucional a la tutela judicial efectiva del administrado y el principio constitucional control interórganos, formulándose la pregunta ¿Cuál es el efecto del proceso contencioso administrativo urgente frente a las actuaciones de la administración relacionadas a un reglamento?, con el objetivo de explicar el efecto del proceso contencioso administrativo urgente frente a las actuaciones de la administración relacionadas a un reglamento. Con diseño de estudio cualitativo no experimental, se aplicó una encuesta de diez preguntas con respuestas dicotómicas, la muestra estaba conformada por 10 personas, entre abogados esp...

The tools of the internet are increasingly influencing society, law and the jurisdictional function (even more so in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). The impact of the first web generation was overwhelming, but the second generation offers advantages and specifications which it seems will not be detected or appreciated in the future, despite its potential to produce public value and to build a new relationship between justice and society. In this sense, this article explains the proposed digital transformation that has taken place between 2017 and 2020 (basis, purpose, and projection). Finally, we will set out our vision for the future of organizational, digital, and social transformation.

The present and future challenges of the jurisdictional function are also those of the organizations that integrate the justice system and of society as a whole. A jurisdictional response or the response of these organizations alone will be insufficient. A systemic and holistic vision is needed for any policy or management. The education system, the economy and new technologies are three segments clearly committed, but in a transformative way: their communion allows outlining a jurisdictional structure with a different systemic insertion.

The contentious-administrative proceeding is an ordinary procedural instrument designed to offer procedural protection against the actions of the administrative authorities, as well as to legally control their functions. Their urgent nature serves to offer said protection and carry out said control, in terms of the de facto actions and omissions of the Administration. However, our legislation does not consider those cases in which the de facto action is produced with respect to the provisions established in a rule, or when the behavior of the administrative authority omits the provisions of a rule. We are facing two cases in which the constitutional principle of inter-unit control and the constitutional right to effective legal protection are affected.

This assay presents the due process of law as a constitutionalized human right facing the Peruvian administrative proceeding. It describes the road traveled by the former up to its ultimate acknowledgement, in the administrative law, through the different regulatory, doctrinarian and jurisprudential instruments. It shows the present consolidation of said right in an administrative headquarters and offers clues for its future interpretation and attention, from the national and compared viewpoint.

The article presents a brief history of the Peruvian administrative process, from the 19th century to the 21st century, both in the normative (constitutional and legal), doctrinal and jurisprudential fields. It explains the scope of its constitutional recognition, its main principles and its most important concepts. It also explores itsfuture perspectives.

The tools of the internet are increasingly influencing society, law and the jurisdictional function (even more so in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). The impact of the first web generation was overwhelming, but the second generation offers advantages and specifications which it seems will not be detected or appreciated in the future, despite its potential to produce public value and to build a new relationship between justice and society. In this sense, this article explains the proposed digital transformation that has taken place between 2017 and 2020 (basis, purpose, and projection). Finally, we will set out our vision for the future of organizational, digital, and social transformation.

The present and future challenges of the jurisdictional function are also those of the organizations that integrate the justice system and of society as a whole. A jurisdictional response or the response of these organizations alone will be insufficient. A systemic and holistic vision is needed for any policy or management. The education system, the economy and new technologies are three segments clearly committed, but in a transformative way: their communion allows outlining a jurisdictional structure with a different systemic insertion.

The contentious-administrative proceeding is an ordinary procedural instrument designed to offer procedural protection against the actions of the administrative authorities, as well as to legally control their functions. Their urgent nature serves to offer said protection and carry out said control, in terms of the de facto actions and omissions of the Administration. However, our legislation does not consider those cases in which the de facto action is produced with respect to the provisions established in a rule, or when the behavior of the administrative authority omits the provisions of a rule. We are facing two cases in which the constitutional principle of inter-unit control and the constitutional right to effective legal protection are affected.

This assay presents the due process of law as a constitutionalized human right facing the Peruvian administrative proceeding. It describes the road traveled by the former up to its ultimate acknowledgement, in the administrative law, through the different regulatory, doctrinarian and jurisprudential instruments. It shows the present consolidation of said right in an administrative headquarters and offers clues for its future interpretation and attention, from the national and compared viewpoint.

The article presents a brief history of the Peruvian administrative process, from the 19th century to the 21st century, both in the normative (constitutional and legal), doctrinal and jurisprudential fields. It explains the scope of its constitutional recognition, its main principles and its most important concepts. It also explores itsfuture perspectives.

Cuando uno ingresa a las aulas de postgrado, no sólo lo debe hacer con el fin de adquirir nuevos conocimientos, perfeccionar los ya reunidos, especializar estos o para mejorar sustancialmente nuestra hoja de vida. Creemos que, sustancialmente, los ciclos de maestría sirven para todo ello, pero aun para más. Son dos los valores que deben cultivarse a lo largo del curso de postgrado, concretamente dos vocaciones: la docencia y la investigación. Estando en cualquier lugar, es fácil denominar a los estudios de postgrado como “maestría”. El sólo nombre evoca la palabra “maestro”, puntualmente, nos referimos a la formación del maestro, que no sólo se obtiene suministrando a la persona de más conocimientos en una especial rama jurídica, sino sobretodo desarrollando en él la voluntad y las aptitudes propias de una de las más sublimes tareas humanas, la de transmitir informac...