As the use of new technologies increases, the damages caused by the improper personal data processing are more frequent nationwide and around the world. Therefore, it is important to know how companies and individuals causing this type of damage civilly respond, as it will be an important tool for, among other effects, discouraging the proliferation of this type of damage and efficiently determining its cost. To this end, we will analyze if the Personal Data Protection Law and its regulations state a special civil liability regime and subsequently analyze and apply the proper regulations of the Civil Code.

La Business Judgment Rule es una regla que ha sido introducida en el texto del Anteproyecto de la Ley General de Sociedades con la finalidad de proteger la discrecionalidad empresarial de los directores y gerentes de las sociedades anónimas peruanas. En el siguiente ensayo analizaremos normativa y jurisprudencia comparada con el fin de constatar su necesidad y compatibilidad con nuestro sistema jurídico de responsabilidad civil.

The present article discusses the constitutionality of the system for eliminating bureaucratic barriers implemented by the Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas (CEB) and the Sala de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas (SEL) of INDECOPI. It demonstrates that these entities do not engage in strict constitutional review but are limited to declaring the illegality or unreasonableness of bureaucratic barriers without repealing the underlying norms. Thus, they do not assume jurisdictional functions nor conduct a proper constitutional review of general administrative provisions and administrative acts. Instead, they ensure the legality and reasonableness of administrative regulation, coexisting with other forms of constitutional control such as the popular action and diffuse control.

The present article discusses the constitutionality of the system for eliminating bureaucratic barriers implemented by the Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas (CEB) and the Sala de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas (SEL) of INDECOPI. It demonstrates that these entities do not engage in strict constitutional review but are limited to declaring the illegality or unreasonableness of bureaucratic barriers without repealing the underlying norms. Thus, they do not assume jurisdictional functions nor conduct a proper constitutional review of general administrative provisions and administrative acts. Instead, they ensure the legality and reasonableness of administrative regulation, coexisting with other forms of constitutional control such as the popular action and diffuse control.

The present article discusses the constitutionality of the system for eliminating bureaucratic barriers implemented by the Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas (CEB) and the Sala de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas (SEL) of INDECOPI. It demonstrates that these entities do not engage in strict constitutional review but are limited to declaring the illegality or unreasonableness of bureaucratic barriers without repealing the underlying norms. Thus, they do not assume jurisdictional functions nor conduct a proper constitutional review of general administrative provisions and administrative acts. Instead, they ensure the legality and reasonableness of administrative regulation, coexisting with other forms of constitutional control such as the popular action and diffuse control.