No presenta resumen.

In the last couple of years, the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property has focused its efforts on the persecution and sanction of horizontal practices, initiating a substantial step in favor of improving free market competition.This paper analyses the reasons why public bid riggings are considered per se illegal conducts by our national legislation, as well as how the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property has prosecuted and sanctioned these practices. The authors consider that classifying bid riggings as per se illegal is a consequence of their social impact, since there aren’t any economic reasonsthat differentiate them from other per se illegal conducts.

El autor analiza los aspectos vinculados a la procedibilidad de los recursos de anulación de laudo con motivo de la infracción al deber de debida motivación. Asímismo, se realiza una revisión de jurisprudencia de las cortes peruanas sobre situaciones relevantes que determinaron la anulación de laudos arbitrales por la infracción a dicho deber.

In the last couple of years, the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property has focused its efforts on the persecution and sanction of horizontal practices, initiating a substantial step in favor of improving free market competition.This paper analyses the reasons why public bid riggings are considered per se illegal conducts by our national legislation, as well as how the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property has prosecuted and sanctioned these practices. The authors consider that classifying bid riggings as per se illegal is a consequence of their social impact, since there aren’t any economic reasonsthat differentiate them from other per se illegal conducts.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

Brasil, Argentina, Colombia y Perú optaron por la liberalización como solución a sus respectivas crisis energéticas. Todas recurrieron a herramientas comunes (liberalización, desintegración vertical, privatizaciones, eliminación de monopolios estatales, creación de infraestructura administrativa). Brasil, Argentina y Perú consideraron que la liberalización, por sí sola, sería suficiente para atraer la inversión privada. Ninguno de ellos logró salir de las crisis energéticas que, precisamente, motivaron la liberalización. Ni Brasil ni Argentina contaron con herramientas para incentivar el surgimiento de competencia (licitaciones, garantías). Perú, que contaba con ellas, simplemente no supo utilizarlas. Brasil, finalmente, optó por la planificación (imperativa). Si bien todos ellos recurrieron a la liberalización como alternativa a sus crisis energéticas, aplicaron po...

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen.

In the last couple of years, the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property has focused its efforts on the persecution and sanction of horizontal practices, initiating a substantial step in favor of improving free market competition.This paper analyses the reasons why public bid riggings are considered per se illegal conducts by our national legislation, as well as how the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property has prosecuted and sanctioned these practices. The authors consider that classifying bid riggings as per se illegal is a consequence of their social impact, since there aren’t any economic reasonsthat differentiate them from other per se illegal conducts.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El autor analiza los aspectos vinculados a la procedibilidad de los recursos de anulación de laudo con motivo de la infracción al deber de debida motivación. Asímismo, se realiza una revisión de jurisprudencia de las cortes peruanas sobre situaciones relevantes que determinaron la anulación de laudos arbitrales por la infracción a dicho deber.

No presenta resumen.