Siendo tan tenue la línea que divide al dolo eventual de la imprudencia consciente, es necesario contar con unpanorama claro para distinguirlos, ya que ello puede cambiar un determinado tratmiento penal por uno muy distinto. Ello es brindado por la autora mediante una exposición sobre las teorías del dolo eventual y de sus respectivas críticas. Asimismo, el artículo tiene el valor agregado de sacar de la abstracción los distintos conceptos que aborda, con ejemplos y cuadros didácticos que buscan que el lector pueda  disipar las dudas sobre el tema.

The Criminal Code exempts from criminal liabilityany person when they act with valid consent fromthe holder of the legal asset of free disposal. This exclusion of criminal responsibility raises multiplequestions.Which legal rights can be freely disposed? Is it that all individual legal rights are of free disposal? If that is the case, which legal basis justifies it? Does the holder’s consent means that the behavior is unlawful, or is it a non-criminal behavior?In this paper, the author answers all these questions, emphasizing that, according to the type of State we live in, the legal-criminal rights are protected to allow the self-realization of every person. Based on that, the author maintains that all criminal-legal rights are of free disposal, and that  the  holder’s  consent  is  a non-criminality cause.

This article intends to analyze treatment and functions assigned to the penalty by our Peruvian Constitution and the way this legal institution is conducted at the prescribed basic penalty level (imposed by the legislator ineach type of criminal offence), the specific penalty level (imposed by the judge according to its individual characteristics in each case) and at the penitentiary enforcement level. Finally recommends some considerations for carrying out a possible legislative reform in accordance with a criminal policy plan within our constitutional framework.

El arresto ciudadano, o también llamado detención ciudadana, supone la privación de la libertad de una persona debido a la constatación de la comisión de un hecho delictivo tipificado como delito en el Código Penal. El legislador otorga al ciudadano de a pie la posibilidad de privar a otro de su libertad, frente a la constatación de la comisión de un delito en flagrancia (o de otros supuestos indicados en la ley); lo que implica que el individuo no solo podrá contribuir de forma excepcional con la seguridad pública sino que, además, deberá cumplir con los presupuestos que son propios a toda medida cautelar personal: el fumus bonis iuris (apariencia de buen derecho) y el periculum in mora (peligro en la demora). Habida cuenta de la naturaleza de la libertad como derecho fundamental, resulta conveniente establecer los márgenes y límites para la aplicación de esta figura, pue...

This article intends to analyze treatment and functions assigned to the penalty by our Peruvian Constitution and the way this legal institution is conducted at the prescribed basic penalty level (imposed by the legislator ineach type of criminal offence), the specific penalty level (imposed by the judge according to its individual characteristics in each case) and at the penitentiary enforcement level. Finally recommends some considerations for carrying out a possible legislative reform in accordance with a criminal policy plan within our constitutional framework.

The Criminal Code exempts from criminal liabilityany person when they act with valid consent fromthe holder of the legal asset of free disposal. This exclusion of criminal responsibility raises multiplequestions.Which legal rights can be freely disposed? Is it that all individual legal rights are of free disposal? If that is the case, which legal basis justifies it? Does the holder’s consent means that the behavior is unlawful, or is it a non-criminal behavior?In this paper, the author answers all these questions, emphasizing that, according to the type of State we live in, the legal-criminal rights are protected to allow the self-realization of every person. Based on that, the author maintains that all criminal-legal rights are of free disposal, and that  the  holder’s  consent  is  a non-criminality cause.

En el presente artículo se analiza la figura del consentimiento presunto, afirmando que en dichos casos lo que existe realmente es una suposición. De esta manera, se afirma que no se puede alegar atipicidad por consentimiento, tomando en cuenta que el individuo en realidad no hace uso de su autonomía.

This article intends to analyze treatment and functions assigned to the penalty by our Peruvian Constitution and the way this legal institution is conducted at the prescribed basic penalty level (imposed by the legislator ineach type of criminal offence), the specific penalty level (imposed by the judge according to its individual characteristics in each case) and at the penitentiary enforcement level. Finally recommends some considerations for carrying out a possible legislative reform in accordance with a criminal policy plan within our constitutional framework.

Siendo tan tenue la línea que divide al dolo eventual de la imprudencia consciente, es necesario contar con unpanorama claro para distinguirlos, ya que ello puede cambiar un determinado tratmiento penal por uno muy distinto. Ello es brindado por la autora mediante una exposición sobre las teorías del dolo eventual y de sus respectivas críticas. Asimismo, el artículo tiene el valor agregado de sacar de la abstracción los distintos conceptos que aborda, con ejemplos y cuadros didácticos que buscan que el lector pueda  disipar las dudas sobre el tema.

The Criminal Code exempts from criminal liabilityany person when they act with valid consent fromthe holder of the legal asset of free disposal. This exclusion of criminal responsibility raises multiplequestions.Which legal rights can be freely disposed? Is it that all individual legal rights are of free disposal? If that is the case, which legal basis justifies it? Does the holder’s consent means that the behavior is unlawful, or is it a non-criminal behavior?In this paper, the author answers all these questions, emphasizing that, according to the type of State we live in, the legal-criminal rights are protected to allow the self-realization of every person. Based on that, the author maintains that all criminal-legal rights are of free disposal, and that  the  holder’s  consent  is  a non-criminality cause.

Siendo tan tenue la línea que divide al dolo eventual de la imprudencia consciente, es necesario contar con unpanorama claro para distinguirlos, ya que ello puede cambiar un determinado tratmiento penal por uno muy distinto. Ello es brindado por la autora mediante una exposición sobre las teorías del dolo eventual y de sus respectivas críticas. Asimismo, el artículo tiene el valor agregado de sacar de la abstracción los distintos conceptos que aborda, con ejemplos y cuadros didácticos que buscan que el lector pueda  disipar las dudas sobre el tema.

No presenta resumen

No contiene resumen

In this paper, the author analyzes the alleged consent, stating their stance against it and proposing, instead, the alleged will, considering that the last is right for describe the legal fiction used to recreate the moment in which the legal holder knows the fact and have the possibility of providing consent to excute the ‘ilicit’ action. In this line, the author reviewed the theories that explain the legal nature of the alleged will, rejecting it as a noncriminal behavior and considering it an autonomous underlying justification. Also, the author describes the requirements of this alleged will, differentiating it from other situations as subrogation. Finally, the author makes a review of the two categories where the alleged will occurs: performances in foreign interest and actions on self-interest.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

In this paper, the author analyzes the alleged consent, stating their stance against it and proposing, instead, the alleged will, considering that the last is right for describe the legal fiction used to recreate the moment in which the legal holder knows the fact and have the possibility of providing consent to excute the ‘ilicit’ action. In this line, the author reviewed the theories that explain the legal nature of the alleged will, rejecting it as a noncriminal behavior and considering it an autonomous underlying justification. Also, the author describes the requirements of this alleged will, differentiating it from other situations as subrogation. Finally, the author makes a review of the two categories where the alleged will occurs: performances in foreign interest and actions on self-interest.

El presente artículo tiene por objeto el análisis del delito penal contable regulado en la Ley penal tributaria. Paraello, la autora pone énfasis en la determinación del bien jurídico protegido por la norma penal. Asimismo, a la luz de la discusión sobre la naturaleza del delito, de lesión, de peligro concreto o abstracto, nos presenta las posturas de importantes juristas españoles que forman parte del debate doctrinal, debido a la similitud de regulación entre la legislación peruana y española respecto al delito contable.Conozca un poco más sobre el delito contable, modalidad penal que involucra una convergencia entre los principios tributarios y penales, y sobre la interpretación de la norma penal más acorde con los principios del derecho.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El artículo no presenta resumen.