Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
Descripción del Articulo
Electoral cycles are highly charged, politically intense moments that influence public discourse. Political elites, citizens, and the traditional news media seek to generate opinions and interactions on social networks. This research is motivated by the following questions: What are the communicativ...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
Institución: | Universidad de Lima |
Repositorio: | ULIMA-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ulima.edu.pe:20.500.12724/21831 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831 https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Pendiente |
id |
RULI_83c5ea248a7521ec34380f5686ab01b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ulima.edu.pe:20.500.12724/21831 |
network_acronym_str |
RULI |
network_name_str |
ULIMA-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
3883 |
spelling |
Santillán Vásquez, Manuel ÁngelMonard, ElohimSantillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel2025-01-14T16:02:32Z2025-01-14T16:02:32Z2024Santillán-Vásquez, M. A., & Monard, E. (2024). Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter. Communication and Society. Communication & Society, 37(4), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-902386-7876https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831Communication and Society121541816https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-902-s2.0-85207516407Electoral cycles are highly charged, politically intense moments that influence public discourse. Political elites, citizens, and the traditional news media seek to generate opinions and interactions on social networks. This research is motivated by the following questions: What are the communicative and deliberative practices used in these spaces? Is it possible to identify the characteristics that –through deliberative conversations– potentially foster or undermine democratic debate, particularly when using populist and polarizing discourse? Using a mixed methods approach, we apply a social network analysis tool to track conversations and identify the volume of political discourse (N=346,000). Using selective and staged filtering, we identified posts from nine Peruvian Twitter accounts during the September 2022 electoral campaign in Lima: three candidates, three media outlets, and three accounts with high levels of engagement. Our data comprised the comments from these nine accounts and was extracted using an Application Programming Interface (API). Subsequently, we carried out ethnographic content analysis on publications with more than 30 comments. In this phase, we analyzed Twitter comments using a codebook to identify deliberative practices and user responses. Our findings underscore the significant role of principal media outlets in shaping political conversation on Twitter. We also discovered that attempts to interact and deliberate were often overshadowed by heated comments attempting to impose opinions on others. Most importantly, our research reveals a widespread disillusionment with politics, political institutions, and even the political preferences of fellow citizens in Peru, highlighting a key challenge for democratic discourse on social media. © 2024 Communication & Society.application/htmlengServicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de NavarraESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Repositorio Institucional - UlimaUniversidad de Limareponame:ULIMA-Institucionalinstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAPendientePendienteDiscursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo en ScopusSantillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel (Comunicación)Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel (Universidad de Lima)PendientePendiente20.500.12724/21831oai:repositorio.ulima.edu.pe:20.500.12724/218312025-03-06 09:57:49.879Repositorio Universidad de Limarepositorio@ulima.edu.pe |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
title |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
spellingShingle |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel Pendiente Pendiente |
title_short |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
title_full |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
title_fullStr |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
title_sort |
Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter |
author |
Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel |
author_facet |
Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel Monard, Elohim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Monard, Elohim |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel Monard, Elohim |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Pendiente |
topic |
Pendiente Pendiente |
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
Pendiente |
description |
Electoral cycles are highly charged, politically intense moments that influence public discourse. Political elites, citizens, and the traditional news media seek to generate opinions and interactions on social networks. This research is motivated by the following questions: What are the communicative and deliberative practices used in these spaces? Is it possible to identify the characteristics that –through deliberative conversations– potentially foster or undermine democratic debate, particularly when using populist and polarizing discourse? Using a mixed methods approach, we apply a social network analysis tool to track conversations and identify the volume of political discourse (N=346,000). Using selective and staged filtering, we identified posts from nine Peruvian Twitter accounts during the September 2022 electoral campaign in Lima: three candidates, three media outlets, and three accounts with high levels of engagement. Our data comprised the comments from these nine accounts and was extracted using an Application Programming Interface (API). Subsequently, we carried out ethnographic content analysis on publications with more than 30 comments. In this phase, we analyzed Twitter comments using a codebook to identify deliberative practices and user responses. Our findings underscore the significant role of principal media outlets in shaping political conversation on Twitter. We also discovered that attempts to interact and deliberate were often overshadowed by heated comments attempting to impose opinions on others. Most importantly, our research reveals a widespread disillusionment with politics, political institutions, and even the political preferences of fellow citizens in Peru, highlighting a key challenge for democratic discourse on social media. © 2024 Communication & Society. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-14T16:02:32Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-14T16:02:32Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo en Scopus |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv |
Santillán-Vásquez, M. A., & Monard, E. (2024). Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter. Communication and Society. Communication & Society, 37(4), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2386-7876 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831 |
dc.identifier.journal.none.fl_str_mv |
Communication and Society |
dc.identifier.isni.none.fl_str_mv |
121541816 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90 |
dc.identifier.scopusid.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85207516407 |
identifier_str_mv |
Santillán-Vásquez, M. A., & Monard, E. (2024). Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter. Communication and Society. Communication & Society, 37(4), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90 2386-7876 Communication and Society 121541816 2-s2.0-85207516407 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831 https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra |
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv |
ES |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional - Ulima Universidad de Lima reponame:ULIMA-Institucional instname:Universidad de Lima instacron:ULIMA |
instname_str |
Universidad de Lima |
instacron_str |
ULIMA |
institution |
ULIMA |
reponame_str |
ULIMA-Institucional |
collection |
ULIMA-Institucional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad de Lima |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ulima.edu.pe |
_version_ |
1846612286089723904 |
score |
12.884314 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).