Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter

Descripción del Articulo

Electoral cycles are highly charged, politically intense moments that influence public discourse. Political elites, citizens, and the traditional news media seek to generate opinions and interactions on social networks. This research is motivated by the following questions: What are the communicativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel, Monard, Elohim
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:ULIMA-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ulima.edu.pe:20.500.12724/21831
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831
https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Pendiente
id RULI_83c5ea248a7521ec34380f5686ab01b4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ulima.edu.pe:20.500.12724/21831
network_acronym_str RULI
network_name_str ULIMA-Institucional
repository_id_str 3883
spelling Santillán Vásquez, Manuel ÁngelMonard, ElohimSantillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel2025-01-14T16:02:32Z2025-01-14T16:02:32Z2024Santillán-Vásquez, M. A., & Monard, E. (2024). Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter. Communication and Society. Communication & Society, 37(4), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-902386-7876https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831Communication and Society121541816https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-902-s2.0-85207516407Electoral cycles are highly charged, politically intense moments that influence public discourse. Political elites, citizens, and the traditional news media seek to generate opinions and interactions on social networks. This research is motivated by the following questions: What are the communicative and deliberative practices used in these spaces? Is it possible to identify the characteristics that –through deliberative conversations– potentially foster or undermine democratic debate, particularly when using populist and polarizing discourse? Using a mixed methods approach, we apply a social network analysis tool to track conversations and identify the volume of political discourse (N=346,000). Using selective and staged filtering, we identified posts from nine Peruvian Twitter accounts during the September 2022 electoral campaign in Lima: three candidates, three media outlets, and three accounts with high levels of engagement. Our data comprised the comments from these nine accounts and was extracted using an Application Programming Interface (API). Subsequently, we carried out ethnographic content analysis on publications with more than 30 comments. In this phase, we analyzed Twitter comments using a codebook to identify deliberative practices and user responses. Our findings underscore the significant role of principal media outlets in shaping political conversation on Twitter. We also discovered that attempts to interact and deliberate were often overshadowed by heated comments attempting to impose opinions on others. Most importantly, our research reveals a widespread disillusionment with politics, political institutions, and even the political preferences of fellow citizens in Peru, highlighting a key challenge for democratic discourse on social media. © 2024 Communication & Society.application/htmlengServicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de NavarraESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Repositorio Institucional - UlimaUniversidad de Limareponame:ULIMA-Institucionalinstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAPendientePendienteDiscursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo en ScopusSantillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel (Comunicación)Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel (Universidad de Lima)PendientePendiente20.500.12724/21831oai:repositorio.ulima.edu.pe:20.500.12724/218312025-03-06 09:57:49.879Repositorio Universidad de Limarepositorio@ulima.edu.pe
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
title Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
spellingShingle Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel
Pendiente
Pendiente
title_short Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
title_full Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
title_fullStr Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
title_sort Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter
author Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel
author_facet Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel
Monard, Elohim
author_role author
author2 Monard, Elohim
author2_role author
dc.contributor.other.none.fl_str_mv Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santillán Vásquez, Manuel Ángel
Monard, Elohim
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pendiente
topic Pendiente
Pendiente
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv Pendiente
description Electoral cycles are highly charged, politically intense moments that influence public discourse. Political elites, citizens, and the traditional news media seek to generate opinions and interactions on social networks. This research is motivated by the following questions: What are the communicative and deliberative practices used in these spaces? Is it possible to identify the characteristics that –through deliberative conversations– potentially foster or undermine democratic debate, particularly when using populist and polarizing discourse? Using a mixed methods approach, we apply a social network analysis tool to track conversations and identify the volume of political discourse (N=346,000). Using selective and staged filtering, we identified posts from nine Peruvian Twitter accounts during the September 2022 electoral campaign in Lima: three candidates, three media outlets, and three accounts with high levels of engagement. Our data comprised the comments from these nine accounts and was extracted using an Application Programming Interface (API). Subsequently, we carried out ethnographic content analysis on publications with more than 30 comments. In this phase, we analyzed Twitter comments using a codebook to identify deliberative practices and user responses. Our findings underscore the significant role of principal media outlets in shaping political conversation on Twitter. We also discovered that attempts to interact and deliberate were often overshadowed by heated comments attempting to impose opinions on others. Most importantly, our research reveals a widespread disillusionment with politics, political institutions, and even the political preferences of fellow citizens in Peru, highlighting a key challenge for democratic discourse on social media. © 2024 Communication & Society.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-14T16:02:32Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-14T16:02:32Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo en Scopus
format article
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv Santillán-Vásquez, M. A., & Monard, E. (2024). Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter. Communication and Society. Communication & Society, 37(4), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2386-7876
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831
dc.identifier.journal.none.fl_str_mv Communication and Society
dc.identifier.isni.none.fl_str_mv 121541816
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90
dc.identifier.scopusid.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85207516407
identifier_str_mv Santillán-Vásquez, M. A., & Monard, E. (2024). Discursive Practices during an Electoral Cycle: Public Opinion and Political Disillusionment on Twitter. Communication and Society. Communication & Society, 37(4), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90
2386-7876
Communication and Society
121541816
2-s2.0-85207516407
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/21831
https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.73-90
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv ES
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional - Ulima
Universidad de Lima
reponame:ULIMA-Institucional
instname:Universidad de Lima
instacron:ULIMA
instname_str Universidad de Lima
instacron_str ULIMA
institution ULIMA
reponame_str ULIMA-Institucional
collection ULIMA-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad de Lima
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ulima.edu.pe
_version_ 1846612286089723904
score 12.884314
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).