Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program
Descripción del Articulo
Richard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to un...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | portugués español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/202219 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26645 https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202401.003 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | National Council of Justice Due process Justice Judiciary Richard Susskind Online courts Conselho Nacional de Justiça Devido processo legal Justiça Judiciário Tribunais virtuais https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 |
Sumario: | Richard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to understand the structuring legal concept of the Virtual Court, created by Richard Susskind, to identify its premises, foundations, and pretensions. It then shows how Susskind’s Virtual Court has been applied in the Brazilian legal system through the Justice 4.0 program. Finally, the current policies are briefly analyzed to verify their compatibility with due process of law. Thus, the research problem that guides this article and the proposed objectives can be expressed by the following question: has the Justice 4.0 Program complied with the foundations and fundamental precepts of Richard Susskind’s Virtual Courts, as well the Distributive Justice? The conclusion is that despite technological and legal advances, the Justice 4.0 Program is still precarious in terms of accessibility, transparency, and proportionality of justice. The method used is integrated research combined with bibliographical research. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).