Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program

Descripción del Articulo

Richard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Santos Divino, Sthéfano Bruno
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:portugués
español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/29550
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:National Council of Justice
Due process
Justice
Judiciary
Richard Susskind
Online courts
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Devido processo legal
Justiça
Judiciário
Tribunais virtuais
Descripción
Sumario:Richard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to understand the structuring legal concept of the Virtual Court, created by Richard Susskind, to identify its premises, foundations, and pretensions. It then shows how Susskind’s Virtual Court has been applied in the Brazilian legal system through the Justice 4.0 program. Finally, the current policies are briefly analyzed to verify their compatibility with due process of law. Thus, the research problem that guides this article and the proposed objectives can be expressed by the following question: has the Justice 4.0 Program complied with the foundations and fundamental precepts of Richard Susskind’s Virtual Courts, as well the Distributive Justice? The conclusion is that despite technological and legal advances, the Justice 4.0 Program is still precarious in terms of accessibility, transparency, and proportionality of justice. The method used is integrated research combined with bibliographical research.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).