El recurso al estado de emergencia por el Gobierno peruano durante la pandemia y su conformidad con el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos

• Autor: Huamán, Brenda
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2022
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/193314
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/26020/24510; https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.202201.010
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: State of emergency; Pandemic; Derogation of human rights; Use of force; International human rights law; International humanitarian law; Estado de emergencia; Pandemia; COVID-19 (Enfermedad); Suspensión de derechos humanos; Uso de la fuerza; Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos; Derecho internacional humanitario; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.09.01

This paper studies the states of emergency declared in Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time frime that began with the arrival of this virus to Peru during the government of Martin Vizcarra and continues up to the present. In this way, it is explained that the «normalisation» of the use of states of emergency has remained a recurrent trend in Peruvian politics during the period analysed, and that this practice does not usually meet the international standards required for its establishment, such as the principles of legality, proclamation, notification, exceptionality, necessity and proportionality, temporality, non-discrimination, and compatibility with international law. After analysing each of these principles, the text reveals that during the period studied this figure has been used consistently to prevent the spread of the virus and its variants, to re-establish social coexistence, but also to address situations of social conflict, increased public insecurity, organised crime and to combat terrorist remnants. It is also identified that, in general, this government practice has directly and indirectly limitedthe exercise of different human rights of the inhabitants without any reasonable justification.