The Peruvian government's use of the State of Emergency during the pandemic and its compliance with International Human Rights Law

Descripción del Articulo

This paper studies the states of emergency declared in Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time frime that began with the arrival of this virus to Peru during the government of Martin Vizcarra and continues up to the present. In this way, it is explained that the «normalisation» of the use of state...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Huamán, Brenda
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/26020
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/26020
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:State of emergency
Pandemic
COVID-19
Derogation of human rights
Use of force
International human rights law
International humanitarian law
Estado de emergencia
Pandemia
Suspensión de derechos humanos
Uso de la fuerza
Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos
Derecho internacional humanitario
Descripción
Sumario:This paper studies the states of emergency declared in Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time frime that began with the arrival of this virus to Peru during the government of Martin Vizcarra and continues up to the present. In this way, it is explained that the «normalisation» of the use of states of emergency has remained a recurrent trend in Peruvian politics during the period analysed, and that this practice does not usually meet the international standards required for its establishment, such as the principles of legality, proclamation, notification, exceptionality, necessity and proportionality, temporality, non-discrimination, and compatibility with international law. After analysing each of these principles, the text reveals that during the period studied this figure has been used consistently to prevent the spread of the virus and its variants, to re-establish social coexistence, but also to address situations of social conflict, increased public insecurity, organised crime and to combat terrorist remnants. It is also identified that, in general, this government practice has directly and indirectly limitedthe exercise of different human rights of the inhabitants without any reasonable justification.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).