El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer

Descripción del Articulo

This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend leg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pintore, Anna
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
italiano
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/116188
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19315/19446
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19315/19478
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201702.003
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:formalismo jurídico
Mario Jori
Frederick Schauer
Norma jurídica
Razonamiento jurídico
Texto jurídico
Interpretación
Derrotabilidad
Estado constitucional de derecho
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Descripción
Sumario:This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend legal formalism from the criticisms routinely moved against it. The author maintains that Jori’s and Schauer’s theories may contribute to shed light on (and criticize) the controversial notion of defeasibility of legal rules; they may also contribute to scale down, from a legal-theoretical point of view, the novelties of contemporary constitutional orders; finally, it may help to better understand their working machinery.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).