Computational Thinking Educationfor Students of aPost-Graduate Degree in the Humanities: Flipped Classroom Experiences

Descripción del Articulo

This paper presents the results of two different experiences about computational thinking acquisition,gained within a formal subject taught in a multidisciplinary (Digital Humanities) master program of a face-to-face teaching university of Spain, following a blended learning approach and using flipp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pareja Lora, Antonio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/439
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/439
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Thinking
Computer Uses in Education
E-learning
Learning Packages
Humanities Education
Pensamiento
Informática educativa
Aprendizaje en línea
Módulo de autoaprendizaje
Humanidades
Descripción
Sumario:This paper presents the results of two different experiences about computational thinking acquisition,gained within a formal subject taught in a multidisciplinary (Digital Humanities) master program of a face-to-face teaching university of Spain, following a blended learning approach and using flipped classroom techniques. These results have been obtainedafter imparting lecturing this subject for two consecutive academic years,with similar but distinctive methodologies each. In effect, even though both of them can be considered task-based(or, alternatively, learning-by-doing-based), the first one has focused on grouplearningandhas been inspired by the computer engineering technique of evolutionary prototyping; whereasthe second one builds upon individual learning and case-based (or example-based) learning. Thus, the paper details the parameters defined for each experience and methodology (that is, the participants, the materials, the procedures and the evaluation criteria), together with the main conclusions drawn from this study like, for instance, that group learning has not helped as much as individual learning (at least in this case)identify and correct the errors that occurred while assimilating the contents of the subject.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).