Evidence of Convergent and Discriminant Validity of TAI-State: Influence of Pre-exam Coping Strategies

Descripción del Articulo

The objective was to find out the degree to which the pre-exam coping strategies (PECS) influence the Test Anxiety (TA) – State (TA-State) in psychology students in order to obtain convergent and discriminating evidence from the TAI-State. The study included 156 psychology students (115 women) from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Dominguez-Lara, Sergio Alexis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.upc.edu.pe:article/547
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/547
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:test anxiety
pre-exam coping
university students
validity
reliability
ansiedad ante exámenes
afrontamiento pre-examen
estudiantes universitarios
validez
confiabilidad
ansiedade diante de testes
enfrentamento pré-teste
estudantes universitários
validade
confiabilidade
Descripción
Sumario:The objective was to find out the degree to which the pre-exam coping strategies (PECS) influence the Test Anxiety (TA) – State (TA-State) in psychology students in order to obtain convergent and discriminating evidence from the TAI-State. The study included 156 psychology students (115 women) from a private university in Metropolitan Lima, ages ranging from 18 to 42 (M = 22.51). The instruments used were: Test Anxiety Inventory-State (TAI-State) and the Coping with Pre-Exam Anxiety and Uncertainty-Brief (COPEAU-B), which evaluates four strategies. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify reliability and validity; while structural equation models were used to assess the research model. After the structural regression analysis, the PECSs explain 13.3% of the variance of the TA-State, with task-oriented and search for social support for instrumental reasons strategies as the most influential (β = -.212 and β = .320). The theoretical and practical implications of the study are discussed.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).