Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students

Descripción del Articulo

Traditionally, training in research at the universities has been transmitted as theory (research training, RT); however, the nature of this knowledge benefits from a more practical approach (formative research, FR). The aim of this research was to compare the qualitative differences between these tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barrios González, Erika Egleontina, Delgado Sánchez, Ulises, Hernández Padilla, Eduardo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/735
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:qualitative research
research skills
student research
undergraduate students
investigación cualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigación estudiantil
estudiantes universitarios
pesquisa qualitativa
investigação estudantil
estudantes universitários
id REVUPC_9fbde52afc688a5e64a1b9260caf6153
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/735
network_acronym_str REVUPC
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
Diferencias Cualitativas entre Formación Investigativa e Investigación Formativa de Estudiantes Universitarios
Diferenças qualitativas entre formação investigativa e pesquisa formativa de estudantes universitários
title Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
spellingShingle Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
Barrios González, Erika Egleontina
qualitative research
research skills
student research
undergraduate students
investigación cualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigación estudiantil
estudiantes universitarios
pesquisa qualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigação estudantil
estudantes universitários
title_short Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
title_full Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
title_fullStr Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
title_sort Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate Students
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barrios González, Erika Egleontina
Delgado Sánchez, Ulises
Hernández Padilla, Eduardo
author Barrios González, Erika Egleontina
author_facet Barrios González, Erika Egleontina
Delgado Sánchez, Ulises
Hernández Padilla, Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Delgado Sánchez, Ulises
Hernández Padilla, Eduardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv qualitative research
research skills
student research
undergraduate students
investigación cualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigación estudiantil
estudiantes universitarios
pesquisa qualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigação estudantil
estudantes universitários
topic qualitative research
research skills
student research
undergraduate students
investigación cualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigación estudiantil
estudiantes universitarios
pesquisa qualitativa
habilidades investigativas
investigação estudantil
estudantes universitários
description Traditionally, training in research at the universities has been transmitted as theory (research training, RT); however, the nature of this knowledge benefits from a more practical approach (formative research, FR). The aim of this research was to compare the qualitative differences between these two types of approach to training in the research process. Four focus groups were created: 2 RT and 2 FR. Sixteen categories corresponding to the quantitative research process were chosen for the script, and a total of 30 Psychology students participated. Significant conceptual differences were found regarding the research process. FR students tend to have more clarity regarding concepts, take a larger number of ethical aspects into consideration, and develop an identity as researchers. They prefer qualitative research because of the difficulties they have with statistics. There is a linear view of the research process in both, and change-generating dynamism is perceived as a problem. In sum, the FR students acquire an overview of the process that is perfected with experience, in addition to contributing to an ethical vision and acquiring an identity as researchers, which shows advantages over the other type of training.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
método cualitativo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735
10.19083/ridu.2019.735
url https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735
identifier_str_mv 10.19083/ridu.2019.735
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/911
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/940
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/948
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/971
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/epub+zip
text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019): January - June; 68-85
Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2019): enero-junio ; 68-85
Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; v. 13 n. 1 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 68-85
2223-2516
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron:UPC
instname_str Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron_str UPC
institution UPC
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
collection Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844799339384274944
spelling Qualitative Differences between Research Training and Education Research in Undergraduate StudentsDiferencias Cualitativas entre Formación Investigativa e Investigación Formativa de Estudiantes UniversitariosDiferenças qualitativas entre formação investigativa e pesquisa formativa de estudantes universitáriosBarrios González, Erika EgleontinaDelgado Sánchez, UlisesHernández Padilla, Eduardoqualitative researchresearch skillsstudent researchundergraduate studentsinvestigación cualitativahabilidades investigativasinvestigación estudiantilestudiantes universitariospesquisa qualitativahabilidades investigativasinvestigação estudantilestudantes universitáriosTraditionally, training in research at the universities has been transmitted as theory (research training, RT); however, the nature of this knowledge benefits from a more practical approach (formative research, FR). The aim of this research was to compare the qualitative differences between these two types of approach to training in the research process. Four focus groups were created: 2 RT and 2 FR. Sixteen categories corresponding to the quantitative research process were chosen for the script, and a total of 30 Psychology students participated. Significant conceptual differences were found regarding the research process. FR students tend to have more clarity regarding concepts, take a larger number of ethical aspects into consideration, and develop an identity as researchers. They prefer qualitative research because of the difficulties they have with statistics. There is a linear view of the research process in both, and change-generating dynamism is perceived as a problem. In sum, the FR students acquire an overview of the process that is perfected with experience, in addition to contributing to an ethical vision and acquiring an identity as researchers, which shows advantages over the other type of training.Tradicionalmente la formación en investigación en las universidades había sido transmitida de manera teórica (formación investigativa, FI), sin embargo, la naturaleza de estos conocimientos se beneficia de un enfoque más práctico (investigación formativa, IF). El objetivo fue comparar las diferencias cualitativas entre estos dos tipos de enfoque para la formación en el proceso de investigación. Se formaron cuatro grupos focales: 2 FI y 2 IF. Para el guion se eligieron 16 categorías que correspondían con el proceso de investigación cuantitativa. En total participaron 30 alumnos de la carrera de Psicología. Se encontró que existen diferencias conceptuales significativas con respecto al proceso de investigación. Los estudiantes IF tienden a tener mayor claridad en los conceptos, considerar más aspectos éticos y desarrollar una identidad como investigadores. Prefieren las investigaciones cualitativas debido a las dificultades que tienen con la estadística. En ambos existe una visión lineal del proceso de investigación y el dinamismo que genera cambios lo perciben como un problema. En conclusión, los estudiantes IF adquieren una visión general del proceso que se va perfeccionando con la experiencia, además de contribuir a una visión ética y a adquirir una identidad como investigadores, lo que muestra ventajas sobre el otro tipo de formación.Tradicionalmente a formação em pesquisa nas universidades costumava ser transmitida de forma teórica (formação investigativa, FI); no entanto, a natureza destes conhecimentos beneficia-se de um enfoque mais prático (pesquisa formativa, PF). O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar as diferenças qualitativas entre estes dois tipos de enfoque para a formação no processo de investigação. Formaram-se quatro grupos focais: 2 FI e 2 IF. Para o roteiro selecionaram-se 16 categorias correspondentes à pesquisa quantitativa. No total participaram 30 alunos do curso de Psicologia. Segundo os resultados, existem diferenças conceituais significativas a respeito do processo de pesquisa. Os estudantes IF tendem a ter maior clareza nos conceitos, considerar aspectos mais éticos e desenvolver uma identidade de pesquisadores. Preferem as pesquisas qualitativas, devido às dificuldades que têm perante a estatística. Em ambos existe uma visão lineal do processo de pesquisa e o dinamismo que gera mudanças é percebido como um problema. Em conclusão, os estudantes PF adquirem uma visão geral do processo que se aperfeiçoa com a experiência, além de contribuir com uma visão ética e a adquirir uma identidade como pesquisadores, o de demonstrar vantagens em outro tipo de formação.Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC2019-04-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionmétodo cualitativoapplication/pdfapplication/epub+ziptext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/73510.19083/ridu.2019.735Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019): January - June; 68-85Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2019): enero-junio ; 68-85Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; v. 13 n. 1 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 68-852223-2516reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPCspaenghttps://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/911https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/940https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/948https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/735/971Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7352024-03-04T20:50:20Z
score 13.927358
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).