Comparison of sealing quality of three root canal filling techniques through stereoscopic microscope

• Autores: Jara-Castro, Marisa, Llanoz- Carazas, Mónica, Inga-Chuco, Jesús
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2014
• Institución: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
• Repositorio: Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/11028
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/11028
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Sealing quality; Root canal filling techniques; Beefill; Tagger; Lateral condensation.; Calidad de sellado; Técnica de obturación radicular; Condensación lateral.

Objective: This study is an in vitro evaluation of three-dimensional root canal sealing ability of three obturation techniques: Lateral condensation, Tagger’s hybrid technique and thermoplastic Beefill 2 in 1 in mandible teeth. Methodology: it was used 30 first lower premolars which were randomly divided into three groups of 10 each. Root canals were cleaned, disinfected and shaping. The groups of Lateral condensation technique and Beefill 2 in 1 were prepared with Mtwo System, and Tagger’s hybrid technique with the University of Oregon Crown Down technique. Samples were prepared and cross sections were performed in the third cervical (3 mm), medium (6 mm) and apical (9mm), and then taken to the stereoscopic microscope. Results: Statistical analysis was performed with Chi square and comparison of proportions with the Z tests on 5% level of significance. Group 3 (lateral condensation), Group 2 (hybrid of Tagger), Group 1 (Beefill 2 in 1). In cervical third there were no statistically significant differences between the three systems, (X2=3.36), (p=0.186), it was evidenced the presence of gaps only in groups 2 and 3. At the middle third (X2=6.67) there was statistically significant difference of the seal quality of Beefill respect the others, (p=0.036). At the apical third (X2=8.967) there was statistically significant difference of the seal quality of Beefill respect the others (p=0.014). The comparison of proportions with the Z test, confirmed the significance of the findings. Thermoplastic technique: Beefill 2 in 1, showed optimal quality seal in the three thirds showing statistically significant differences in middle and apical thirds (p<0.05). Conclusion: The thermoplastic continuous wave technique, Beefill 2 in 1 showed better sealing quality in the three thirds, since the heat-softened gutta percha and then being compacted, this runs around the entire root canal.