Social networks consumption in Ecuador An exploratory survey in Riobamba and Quito (2013 – 14)

Descripción del Articulo

Digital communication in Ecuador is relatively differentiated particularly as a consequence of the low Internet connection rate in the Andean Republic According to official figures, in 2013 just four out of ten Ecuadorians had network connection. In addition, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barredo Ibáñez, Daniel, Pérez Zúñiga, José María, Fernández, Montserrat, Vivas, Rocío
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2014
Institución:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/1842
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/comunife/article/view/1842
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Redes sociales; Ecuador; Ley Orgánica de Comunicación; comunicación digital
Social networks; Ecuador; Communication Organic Law; digital communication
Descripción
Sumario:Digital communication in Ecuador is relatively differentiated particularly as a consequence of the low Internet connection rate in the Andean Republic According to official figures, in 2013 just four out of ten Ecuadorians had network connection. In addition, the communication context is in the middle of an interesting transformation process through the approval of instruments like the Communication Organic Law in 2013, which despite its exhaustive nature it does not regulate the communication contents issued by social network users.This article, through a survey targeted to citizens of two of the main cities of the country -Quito and Riobamba- intends to explore and determine how people living in these urban sites use social networks, and the possible age differences. The results indicate that YouTube, Facebook and Google are the social networks mostly used by Ecuadorians. In addition, after establishing that the major focus was on conventional social networks and iconic trends and those that allowed a mainly interpersonal use, the intergenerational and interprovincial gap was confirmed. 
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).