The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143

Descripción del Articulo

In this article the authors analyze whether or not the amendment made to Article 52 of the Organic Law of the Central Reserve Bank, Decree Law N. 26123 by Law 31143, Law that protects consumers of financial services from usury, is constitutional or not, as a result of the Constitutional Court's...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Godos, Alix, Armas Valdivia, Miryam
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8444
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/8444
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:BCR
consumidor
funciones
inconstitucionalidad
tasas de interés
Tribunal Constitucional
usura
Constitutional Court
usury
interest rates
unconstitutionality
consumer
functions
id REVULIMA_7f5e82873cd7009e50eab083b215376a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8444
network_acronym_str REVULIMA
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository_id_str
spelling The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143El Tribunal Constitucional, la regulación de la usura y los cuestionamientos a la constitucionalidad de la modificatoria operada a la Ley Orgánica del BCR por la Ley 31143Godos, AlixArmas Valdivia, MiryamGodos, AlixArmas Valdivia, MiryamBCRconsumidorfuncionesinconstitucionalidadtasas de interésTribunal ConstitucionalusuraBCRConstitutional Courtusuryinterest ratesunconstitutionalityconsumerfunctionsIn this article the authors analyze whether or not the amendment made to Article 52 of the Organic Law of the Central Reserve Bank, Decree Law N. 26123 by Law 31143, Law that protects consumers of financial services from usury, is constitutional or not, as a result of the Constitutional Court's Decision (Plenary. Decision 95/2024-).En el presente artículo los autores realizan un análisis con la finalidad de determinar si efectivamente la modificatoria operada al artículo 52 de la Ley Orgánica del Banco Central de Reserva, Decreto Ley 26123 mediante la Ley 31143, Ley que protege de la usura a los consumidores de los servicios financieros, es constitucional o no, a propósito de Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional1 —Pleno. Sentencia 95/2024—.Universidad de Lima. Alumnos de la Facultad de Comunicación2025-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/844410.26439/advocatus2025.n045.8444Advocatus; No. 045 (2025); 73-89Advocatus; Núm. 045 (2025); 73-892523-62611996-477310.26439/advocatus2025.n045reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Limainstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAspahttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/8444/8072https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/84442025-12-05T18:11:56Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
El Tribunal Constitucional, la regulación de la usura y los cuestionamientos a la constitucionalidad de la modificatoria operada a la Ley Orgánica del BCR por la Ley 31143
title The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
spellingShingle The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
Godos, Alix
BCR
consumidor
funciones
inconstitucionalidad
tasas de interés
Tribunal Constitucional
usura
BCR
Constitutional Court
usury
interest rates
unconstitutionality
consumer
functions
title_short The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
title_full The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
title_fullStr The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
title_full_unstemmed The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
title_sort The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Godos, Alix
Armas Valdivia, Miryam
Godos, Alix
Armas Valdivia, Miryam
author Godos, Alix
author_facet Godos, Alix
Armas Valdivia, Miryam
author_role author
author2 Armas Valdivia, Miryam
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BCR
consumidor
funciones
inconstitucionalidad
tasas de interés
Tribunal Constitucional
usura
BCR
Constitutional Court
usury
interest rates
unconstitutionality
consumer
functions
topic BCR
consumidor
funciones
inconstitucionalidad
tasas de interés
Tribunal Constitucional
usura
BCR
Constitutional Court
usury
interest rates
unconstitutionality
consumer
functions
description In this article the authors analyze whether or not the amendment made to Article 52 of the Organic Law of the Central Reserve Bank, Decree Law N. 26123 by Law 31143, Law that protects consumers of financial services from usury, is constitutional or not, as a result of the Constitutional Court's Decision (Plenary. Decision 95/2024-).
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/8444
10.26439/advocatus2025.n045.8444
url https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/8444
identifier_str_mv 10.26439/advocatus2025.n045.8444
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Advocatus/article/view/8444/8072
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima. Alumnos de la Facultad de Comunicación
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima. Alumnos de la Facultad de Comunicación
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Advocatus; No. 045 (2025); 73-89
Advocatus; Núm. 045 (2025); 73-89
2523-6261
1996-4773
10.26439/advocatus2025.n045
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
instname:Universidad de Lima
instacron:ULIMA
instname_str Universidad de Lima
instacron_str ULIMA
institution ULIMA
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
collection Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1851231070852218880
score 13.884572
The Constitutional Court, the regulation of usury and challengesto the constitutionality of the amendment made to the BCR'sOrganic Law by Law 31143
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares