Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control
Descripción del Articulo
This article explores the tensions between innovation and democratic control in the regulation of artificial intelligence and Big Tech. While Europe adopts proactive regulatory frameworks like the Digital Markets Act, leveraging its tradition of legal sophistication, the United States maintains a re...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31864 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31864 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Artificial intelligence Big Tech Regulation Democratic control Comparative law Inteligencia artificial Regulación Democracia Derecho comparado |
| id |
REVPUCP_be1b7c3d13bf699d84fad9c51c0d5b0a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31864 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental controlEntrevista: inteligencia artificial, Big Tech y Regulación: entre la innovación y el control del GobiernoPicker, Randal C.Artificial intelligenceBig TechRegulationDemocratic controlComparative lawInteligencia artificialBig TechRegulaciónDemocraciaDerecho comparadoThis article explores the tensions between innovation and democratic control in the regulation of artificial intelligence and Big Tech. While Europe adopts proactive regulatory frameworks like the Digital Markets Act, leveraging its tradition of legal sophistication, the United States maintains a reactive stance, relying on general principles and antitrust litigation. China, in turn, represents a distinct model of centralized governance. The discussion analyzes the limits of current legal tools –such as copyright, antitrust, and agency authority– while questioning whether traditional regulatory justifications remain valid in the digital era. The text also reflects on the ideological and political drivers behind current regulatory trends and raises the challenge of measuring Big Tech power beyond market metrics.Este artículo explora las tensiones entre la innovación y el poder de los gobiernos en la regulación de la inteligencia artificial y las Big Tech. Mientras Europa adopta marcos regulatorios proactivos como la Ley de Mercados Digitales, aprovechando su tradición jurídica sofisticada, Estados Unidos mantiene un enfoque reactivo, basado en principios generales y litigios antimonopolio. China, por su parte, representa un modelo distinto de gobernanza centralizada. El texto analiza los límites de herramientas jurídicas tradicionales –como el derecho de autor, el derecho de la competencia y la actuación de las agencias– y cuestiona si sus justificaciones siguen siendo válidas en la era digital. Asimismo, examina los factores ideológicos y políticos detrás de las tendencias regulatorias actuales y plantea el reto de medir el poder de las Big Tech más allá de las métricas de mercado.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2025-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31864THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 87 (2025): Derecho Regulatorio; 351-3551810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31864/27877http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/318642025-08-29T13:32:33Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control Entrevista: inteligencia artificial, Big Tech y Regulación: entre la innovación y el control del Gobierno |
| title |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control |
| spellingShingle |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control Picker, Randal C. Artificial intelligence Big Tech Regulation Democratic control Comparative law Inteligencia artificial Big Tech Regulación Democracia Derecho comparado |
| title_short |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control |
| title_full |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control |
| title_fullStr |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control |
| title_sort |
Interview: artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and Regulation: between innovation and governmental control |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Picker, Randal C. |
| author |
Picker, Randal C. |
| author_facet |
Picker, Randal C. |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Artificial intelligence Big Tech Regulation Democratic control Comparative law Inteligencia artificial Big Tech Regulación Democracia Derecho comparado |
| topic |
Artificial intelligence Big Tech Regulation Democratic control Comparative law Inteligencia artificial Big Tech Regulación Democracia Derecho comparado |
| description |
This article explores the tensions between innovation and democratic control in the regulation of artificial intelligence and Big Tech. While Europe adopts proactive regulatory frameworks like the Digital Markets Act, leveraging its tradition of legal sophistication, the United States maintains a reactive stance, relying on general principles and antitrust litigation. China, in turn, represents a distinct model of centralized governance. The discussion analyzes the limits of current legal tools –such as copyright, antitrust, and agency authority– while questioning whether traditional regulatory justifications remain valid in the digital era. The text also reflects on the ideological and political drivers behind current regulatory trends and raises the challenge of measuring Big Tech power beyond market metrics. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-08-27 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31864 |
| url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31864 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31864/27877 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 87 (2025): Derecho Regulatorio; 351-355 1810-9934 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
| instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| instacron_str |
PUCP |
| institution |
PUCP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1849146369661468672 |
| score |
13.350691 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).