Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program
Descripción del Articulo
Richard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to un...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | portugués español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29550 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | National Council of Justice Due process Justice Judiciary Richard Susskind Online courts Conselho Nacional de Justiça Devido processo legal Justiça Judiciário Tribunais virtuais |
id |
REVPUCP_7a439ff3f6d0452295907f35eff2eb50 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29550 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program Justiça Distributiva e os Tribunais Virtuais de Richard Susskind no Sistema Judiciário brasileiro: uma análise do Programa Justiça 4.0 |
title |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program |
spellingShingle |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program Santos Divino, Sthéfano Bruno National Council of Justice Due process Justice Judiciary Richard Susskind Online courts Conselho Nacional de Justiça Devido processo legal Justiça Judiciário Richard Susskind Tribunais virtuais |
title_short |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program |
title_full |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program |
title_fullStr |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program |
title_sort |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 Program |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Santos Divino, Sthéfano Bruno |
author |
Santos Divino, Sthéfano Bruno |
author_facet |
Santos Divino, Sthéfano Bruno |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
National Council of Justice Due process Justice Judiciary Richard Susskind Online courts Conselho Nacional de Justiça Devido processo legal Justiça Judiciário Richard Susskind Tribunais virtuais |
topic |
National Council of Justice Due process Justice Judiciary Richard Susskind Online courts Conselho Nacional de Justiça Devido processo legal Justiça Judiciário Richard Susskind Tribunais virtuais |
description |
Richard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to understand the structuring legal concept of the Virtual Court, created by Richard Susskind, to identify its premises, foundations, and pretensions. It then shows how Susskind’s Virtual Court has been applied in the Brazilian legal system through the Justice 4.0 program. Finally, the current policies are briefly analyzed to verify their compatibility with due process of law. Thus, the research problem that guides this article and the proposed objectives can be expressed by the following question: has the Justice 4.0 Program complied with the foundations and fundamental precepts of Richard Susskind’s Virtual Courts, as well the Distributive Justice? The conclusion is that despite technological and legal advances, the Justice 4.0 Program is still precarious in terms of accessibility, transparency, and proportionality of justice. The method used is integrated research combined with bibliographical research. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-09-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
por spa |
language |
por spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26645 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26685 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26686 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26687 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
IUS ET VERITAS; No. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54 IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54 IUS ET VERITAS; No. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54 IUS ET VERITAS; N. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54 IUS ET VERITAS; n. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54 1995-2929 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1841535921904680960 |
spelling |
Distributive Justice and Richard Susskind’s Online Courts in the Brazilian Judicial System: an analysis of the Justice 4.0 ProgramJustiça Distributiva e os Tribunais Virtuais de Richard Susskind no Sistema Judiciário brasileiro: uma análise do Programa Justiça 4.0Santos Divino, Sthéfano BrunoNational Council of JusticeDue processJusticeJudiciaryRichard SusskindOnline courtsConselho Nacional de JustiçaDevido processo legalJustiçaJudiciárioRichard SusskindTribunais virtuaisRichard Susskind’s Online Court is no longer just an ideal, but a policy for implementing and developing the judiciary alongside technology. Its application in the Brazilian legal system has been proposed, applied, improved, and constantly refined by the National Council of Justice. The aim is to understand the structuring legal concept of the Virtual Court, created by Richard Susskind, to identify its premises, foundations, and pretensions. It then shows how Susskind’s Virtual Court has been applied in the Brazilian legal system through the Justice 4.0 program. Finally, the current policies are briefly analyzed to verify their compatibility with due process of law. Thus, the research problem that guides this article and the proposed objectives can be expressed by the following question: has the Justice 4.0 Program complied with the foundations and fundamental precepts of Richard Susskind’s Virtual Courts, as well the Distributive Justice? The conclusion is that despite technological and legal advances, the Justice 4.0 Program is still precarious in terms of accessibility, transparency, and proportionality of justice. The method used is integrated research combined with bibliographical research.O Tribunal Virtual de Richard Susskind deixou de ser apenas um conceito para ser uma política de implementação e desenvolvimento do judiciário ao lado da tecnologia. Sua aplicação no sistema jurídico brasileiro foi proposta, aplicada, aprimorada e constantemente aperfeiçoada pelo Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Objetiva-se compreender o conceito jurídico estruturante de Tribunal Virtual, criado por Richard Susskind, para identificar suas premissas, fundamentos e pretensões. Posteriormente, demonstra-se como o Tribunal Virtual de Susskind tem sido aplicado no sistema jurídico brasileiro por meio do Programa Justiça 4.0. Por fim, analisa-se brevemente as políticas em curso para verificar sua compatibilidade com o devido processo legal. Dessa forma, o problema de pesquisa que norteia este artigo e os objetivos propostos podem ser expressos pelo seguinte questionamento: o Programa Justiça 4.0 tem atendido aos fundamentos e aos preceitos fundamentais dos Tribunais Virtuais de Richard Susskind, bem como à Justiça Distributiva? Conclui-se que apesar dos avanços tecnológico e jurídico existentes, o Programa Justiça 4.0 ainda é precário quanto à acessibilidade, a transparência e a proporcionalidade da justiça. O método utilizado é o de pesquisa integrada somado à técnica de pesquisa bibliográfica.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2024-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550IUS ET VERITAS; No. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54IUS ET VERITAS; No. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54IUS ET VERITAS; N. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-54IUS ET VERITAS; n. 68 (2024): Derecho Procesal: Enfoques contemporáneos; 41-541995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPporspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26645http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26685http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26686http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/29550/26687info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/295502025-04-02T14:17:18Z |
score |
13.941313 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).