Green Grabbing and “Weak Land Governance” in Matopiba's Agricultural Frontier

Descripción del Articulo

This article contributes to the current debate on the violation of human rights through the practice of green grabbing. The study reflects upon the situation of territorial insecurity and the struggle for territorial rights of the Akroá Gamela people, who live in the south of the State of Piauí, cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Silva, Anderson Antonio, Tartalha Nascimento Lombardi, Thais, Wylk, José
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/26911
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/26911
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Green Grabbing
Akróa-Gamela Territory
Land
Conflicts
Fragile land governance
Matopiba
Brazil
Acaparamiento Verde
Territorio Akroá-Gamela
Tierra
Conflictos
Débil gobernanza de la tierra
Brasil
Território Akroá-Gamela
Terra
Conflito
Governança fundiária frágil
Descripción
Sumario:This article contributes to the current debate on the violation of human rights through the practice of green grabbing. The study reflects upon the situation of territorial insecurity and the struggle for territorial rights of the Akroá Gamela people, who live in the south of the State of Piauí, characterized by what is called here weak land governance. The indigenous territory studied does not have its homologation process finalized, which means that it does not officially exist, nor does it allow its boundaries to be added to most of the official databases of different governmental spheres. The region where the Akroá Gamela people are located is also situated within an area of advancing agricultural frontier known as Matopiba, located in the Cerrado area, the second largest biome in Brazil and South America. The main goal is to think on how green grabbing wickedly uses legal problems of communication between entities and governance to foster deforestation. To do so, we analyze two land regulation tools: the Rural and Environmental Registration (CAR) and the Vegetation Suppression Authorization (ASV), to understand this process of traditional population and peasants' land rights encroachment.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).