The Concept of Income in Tax Legislation

Descripción del Articulo

This article explores the legal concept of income, focusing on its definition and its implications within the tax legislation. Thus, the author explores two main theories: on the one hand, the source theory establishes that only periodic and lasting income from a specific source is considered as tax...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Medrano Cornejo, Humberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:1974
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6147
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/6147
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Income Tax
Tax Legislation
Source Theory
Capital Gain Theory
Habitual Activities
Tax Reform
Taxable Income
Habituality
Disposition of Assets
Taxable Economic Benefits
Impuesto a la Renta
Legislación Tributaria
Teoría de la Fuente
Teoría del Incremento Patrimonial
Actividades Habituales
Reforma Tributaria
Renta Gravada
Habitualidad
Enajenación de Bienes
Beneficios Económicos Gravados
Descripción
Sumario:This article explores the legal concept of income, focusing on its definition and its implications within the tax legislation. Thus, the author explores two main theories: on the one hand, the source theory establishes that only periodic and lasting income from a specific source is considered as taxable income; on the other hand, the capital gain theory considers as taxable income all benefits received by the taxpayer, regardless of their origin. In this context, the author points out that Peruvian legislation adopts an intermediate formula, which extends the concept of taxable income to certain specific benefits, without going to the extreme of the capital gain theory. He also addresses the challenges in the definition of habitual activities for tax purposes, highlighting the need to establish requirements to qualify a taxpayer as “habitual” due to the lack of a clear definition of “habituality”, which generates problems of interpretation and practical application around what are habitual transactions. Finally, the author details specific examples of profits that are not considered taxable income, which underlines the importance of a clear and precise interpretation in practice.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).