Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students

Descripción del Articulo

Background: To analyze the internal structure of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales-FACES III by evaluating three tentative models. Method: Non-probability sampling of 306 Peruvian students of both sexes between 15 and 26 years of age. The structural pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Caycho Caja, Aaron, Castilla Arias, César Abraham
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
Repositorio:Interacciones
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs3114.ejournals.host:article/160
Enlace del recurso:https://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Factorial analysis
evaluation indices
bifactor model
internal consistency
goodness of fit
id REVIPOPS_e97a5c94c215f744f5e7756541efb703
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs3114.ejournals.host:article/160
network_acronym_str REVIPOPS
network_name_str Interacciones
repository_id_str .
spelling Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian studentsEvaluación de un modelo bifactorial y propiedades psicométricas del FACES III en estudiantes peruanosCaycho Caja, AaronCastilla Arias, César AbrahamFactorial analysisevaluation indicesbifactor modelinternal consistencygoodness of fitBackground: To analyze the internal structure of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales-FACES III by evaluating three tentative models. Method: Non-probability sampling of 306 Peruvian students of both sexes between 15 and 26 years of age. The structural properties and internal consistency of the Original, Bifactorial and One-dimensional models were studied in detail. Results: The bifactorial model has a better fit than the remaining models, but was discarded as it does not satisfy the criteria of the suggested evaluation indices. Likewise, difficulties are observed in the internal consistency of the Flexibility subscale except for the One-Dimensional Model. Conclusion: FACES III is an instrument with consistency and internal structure problems directly associated with the presence of the Flexibility subscale as reported in previous studies.Introducción: Analizar la estructura interna de la Escala de Adaptabilidad y Cohesión Familiar (FACES III) mediante la evaluación de tres modelos tentativos. Método: Muestreo no probabilístico de 306 estudiantes peruanos de ambos sexos de entre 15 y 26 años. Se estudian las propiedades estructurales y de consistencia interna de los modelos Original, Bifactorial y Unidimensional planteados. Resultados: El modelo bifactorial posee mejor bondad de ajuste que los modelos restantes, pero fue descartado ya que no satisface los criterios de los índices de evaluación sugeridos. Asimismo, se observan dificultades en la consistencia interna de la subescala de Flexibilidad a excepción del Modelo Unidimensional. Conclusión: El FACES III es un instrumento con problemas de consistencia y estructura interna directamente asociados a la presencia de la subescala de Flexibilidad tal y como fue reportado en estudios previos.Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica2020-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextotext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/16010.24016/2020.v6n2.160Interacciones; Vol. 6, Núm. 2 (2020): Mayo - Agosto; e160Interacciones; Vol. 6, Núm. 2 (2020): May - August; e160Interacciones: Revistas de Avances en Psicología; Vol. 6, Núm. 2 (2020): May - August; e1602411-59402413-4465reponame:Interaccionesinstname:Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológicainstacron:IPOPSspahttps://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160/218https://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160/264Copyright (c) 2020 Interaccioneshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs3114.ejournals.host:article/1602020-09-14T17:09:36Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
Evaluación de un modelo bifactorial y propiedades psicométricas del FACES III en estudiantes peruanos
title Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
spellingShingle Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
Caycho Caja, Aaron
Factorial analysis
evaluation indices
bifactor model
internal consistency
goodness of fit
title_short Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
title_full Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
title_fullStr Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
title_sort Evaluation of a bifactor model and psychometric properties of FACES III in Peruvian students
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Caycho Caja, Aaron
Castilla Arias, César Abraham
author Caycho Caja, Aaron
author_facet Caycho Caja, Aaron
Castilla Arias, César Abraham
author_role author
author2 Castilla Arias, César Abraham
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Factorial analysis
evaluation indices
bifactor model
internal consistency
goodness of fit
topic Factorial analysis
evaluation indices
bifactor model
internal consistency
goodness of fit
description Background: To analyze the internal structure of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales-FACES III by evaluating three tentative models. Method: Non-probability sampling of 306 Peruvian students of both sexes between 15 and 26 years of age. The structural properties and internal consistency of the Original, Bifactorial and One-dimensional models were studied in detail. Results: The bifactorial model has a better fit than the remaining models, but was discarded as it does not satisfy the criteria of the suggested evaluation indices. Likewise, difficulties are observed in the internal consistency of the Flexibility subscale except for the One-Dimensional Model. Conclusion: FACES III is an instrument with consistency and internal structure problems directly associated with the presence of the Flexibility subscale as reported in previous studies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160
10.24016/2020.v6n2.160
url https://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160
identifier_str_mv 10.24016/2020.v6n2.160
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160/218
https://www.ojs.revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/160/264
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Interacciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Interacciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Interacciones; Vol. 6, Núm. 2 (2020): Mayo - Agosto; e160
Interacciones; Vol. 6, Núm. 2 (2020): May - August; e160
Interacciones: Revistas de Avances en Psicología; Vol. 6, Núm. 2 (2020): May - August; e160
2411-5940
2413-4465
reponame:Interacciones
instname:Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
instacron:IPOPS
instname_str Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
instacron_str IPOPS
institution IPOPS
reponame_str Interacciones
collection Interacciones
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789167426750906368
score 13.871978
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).