ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS

Descripción del Articulo

The Saki monkeys, genus Pithecia Desmarest, 1804, have undergone drastic taxonomic changes in a 2014 revision of the genus. In this revision, Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 and P. inusta Spix, 1823 were considered as valid, although both species have been widely considered synonymous with P. monachus....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: SERRANO-VILLAVICENCIO, José Eduardo, TERRA GARBINO, Guilherme Siniciato
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana
Repositorio:Folia Amazónica
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/729
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/729
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Huapos negros
taxonomía
clasificación
Simiarum
localidad tipo
Saki monkeys
taxonomy
classification
type locality
id REVIIAP_da201d61a0491af39d4e0d85b71c732c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/729
network_acronym_str REVIIAP
network_name_str Folia Amazónica
repository_id_str
spelling ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMSADDENDUM A MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 Y Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 SON SINÓNIMOSADDENDUM A MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 Y Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 SON SINÓNIMOSSERRANO-VILLAVICENCIO, José EduardoTERRA GARBINO, Guilherme SiniciatoHuapos negrostaxonomíaclasificaciónSimiarumlocalidad tipoSaki monkeystaxonomyclassificationSimiarumtype localityThe Saki monkeys, genus Pithecia Desmarest, 1804, have undergone drastic taxonomic changes in a 2014 revision of the genus. In this revision, Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 and P. inusta Spix, 1823 were considered as valid, although both species have been widely considered synonymous with P. monachus. Nonetheless, here we demonstrate, by reviewing the original descriptions of both species, that P. inusta cannot be applied to the Peruvian populations of Pithecia inhabiting primarily the Ucayali River watershed since the original concept of this species, as well as its type locality did not include its putative geographic range. In fact, the area falls completely outside the expedition's itinerary that collected the holotype. Thus, to preserve stability until further evidence is furnished, the above-mentioned Pithecia populations should be regarded as P. monachus.   Los monos huapos, género Pithecia Desmarest, 1804, han sufrido cambios taxonómicos drásticos desde su revisión en 2014. En esta revisión se consideraron válidas Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 y P. inusta Spix, 1823, aunque ambas especies han sido ampliamente consideradas como sinónimos de P. monachus. Sin embargo, aquí demostramos, al revisar las descripciones originales de ambas especies, que P. inusta no puede aplicarse a las poblaciones peruanas de Pithecia que habitan principalmente en la cuenca del río Ucayali, ya que el concepto original de esta especie, así como su localidad tipo, no están incluídas en su rango geográfico putativo. De hecho, la zona queda completamente fuera del itinerario de la expedición que recogió el holotipo. Por lo tanto, para preservar la estabilidad hasta que se proporcionen más pruebas, las poblaciones de Pithecia antes mencionadas deben considerarse como P. monachus.Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana2024-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionCommentComentarioapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/72910.24841/fa.v33i1.729Folia Amazonica; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2024); e33729Folia Amazónica; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2024); e33729Folia Amazónica; v. 33 n. 1 (2024); e337292410-11841018-567410.24841/fa.v33i1reponame:Folia Amazónicainstname:Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruanainstacron:IIAPenghttps://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/729/645Derechos de autor 2024 José Eduardo Serrano-Villavicencio, Dr., Guilherme Siniciato Terra Garbino, Dr.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7292025-06-18T18:58:39Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
ADDENDUM A MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 Y Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 SON SINÓNIMOS
ADDENDUM A MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 Y Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 SON SINÓNIMOS
title ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
spellingShingle ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
SERRANO-VILLAVICENCIO, José Eduardo
Huapos negros
taxonomía
clasificación
Simiarum
localidad tipo
Saki monkeys
taxonomy
classification
Simiarum
type locality
title_short ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
title_full ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
title_fullStr ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
title_full_unstemmed ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
title_sort ADDENDUM TO MARSH (2014): Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 AND Pithecia inusta Spix, 1823 ARE SYNONYMS
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv SERRANO-VILLAVICENCIO, José Eduardo
TERRA GARBINO, Guilherme Siniciato
author SERRANO-VILLAVICENCIO, José Eduardo
author_facet SERRANO-VILLAVICENCIO, José Eduardo
TERRA GARBINO, Guilherme Siniciato
author_role author
author2 TERRA GARBINO, Guilherme Siniciato
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Huapos negros
taxonomía
clasificación
Simiarum
localidad tipo
Saki monkeys
taxonomy
classification
Simiarum
type locality
topic Huapos negros
taxonomía
clasificación
Simiarum
localidad tipo
Saki monkeys
taxonomy
classification
Simiarum
type locality
description The Saki monkeys, genus Pithecia Desmarest, 1804, have undergone drastic taxonomic changes in a 2014 revision of the genus. In this revision, Pithecia hirsuta Spix, 1823 and P. inusta Spix, 1823 were considered as valid, although both species have been widely considered synonymous with P. monachus. Nonetheless, here we demonstrate, by reviewing the original descriptions of both species, that P. inusta cannot be applied to the Peruvian populations of Pithecia inhabiting primarily the Ucayali River watershed since the original concept of this species, as well as its type locality did not include its putative geographic range. In fact, the area falls completely outside the expedition's itinerary that collected the holotype. Thus, to preserve stability until further evidence is furnished, the above-mentioned Pithecia populations should be regarded as P. monachus.   
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Comment
Comentario
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/729
10.24841/fa.v33i1.729
url https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/729
identifier_str_mv 10.24841/fa.v33i1.729
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/729/645
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Folia Amazonica; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2024); e33729
Folia Amazónica; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2024); e33729
Folia Amazónica; v. 33 n. 1 (2024); e33729
2410-1184
1018-5674
10.24841/fa.v33i1
reponame:Folia Amazónica
instname:Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana
instacron:IIAP
instname_str Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana
instacron_str IIAP
institution IIAP
reponame_str Folia Amazónica
collection Folia Amazónica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845792572098740224
score 12.989271
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).