Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012

Descripción del Articulo

The work aims to answer the problem that affects a large sector of the primary crime, petty or bagatelle, where the defendants are deprived of their liberty for breach of the rules of conduct imposed in a suspended sentence in its execution or reserve conviction, basically for nonpayment of the civi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Arrieta Ramírez, Manuel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/249
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/249
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:civil repair
suspended sentence
reparación civil
sentencia condenatoria suspendida
id REVCSJ_db8ff788973a5db2f6d0b300900cabfe
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/249
network_acronym_str REVCSJ
network_name_str Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012¿Es posible la conversión de pena en un acto posterior a la sentencia?, necesidad de replantear el Acuerdo Plenario n.° 3-2012Arrieta Ramírez, Manuelcivil repairsuspended sentencereparación civilsentencia condenatoria suspendidaThe work aims to answer the problem that affects a large sector of the primary crime, petty or bagatelle, where the defendants are deprived of their liberty for breach of the rules of conduct imposed in a suspended sentence in its execution or reserve conviction, basically for nonpayment of the civil repair, in spite of being satisfied such payment but postdated. Therefore, it is proposed that the conversion results viable in execution of a guilty verdict, as well as carrying out a weighing trial between two relevant constitutional principles of the same value and hierarchy, such as the principle of immutability of the judged thing vs. principle of humanity of penalties.El trabajo busca una respuesta al problema que afecta a un gran sector de la delincuencia primaria, de poca monta o de bagatela, donde los procesados se ven privados de su libertad por incumplimiento de las reglas de conducta impuestas en una sentencia condenatoria suspendida en su ejecución o reserva del fallo condenatorio, básicamente por la falta de pago de la reparación civil, a pesar de haberse satisfecho dicho pago pero con fecha posterior. Por lo que se plantea que la conversión de pena resulta viable en ejecución de sentencia condenatoria, como también realizando un juicio de ponderación entre dos principios de relevancia constitucional del mismo valor y jerarquía, como es el principio de inmutabilidad de la cosa juzgada vs. principio de humanidad de las penas.Poder Judicial del Perú2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/24910.35292/ropj.v8i10.249Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 8 Núm. 10 (2016); 507-5262663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v8i10reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstacron:CSJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/249/304Derechos de autor 2016 Manuel Arrieta Ramírezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/2492021-12-12T16:55:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
¿Es posible la conversión de pena en un acto posterior a la sentencia?, necesidad de replantear el Acuerdo Plenario n.° 3-2012
title Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
spellingShingle Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
Arrieta Ramírez, Manuel
civil repair
suspended sentence
reparación civil
sentencia condenatoria suspendida
title_short Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
title_full Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
title_fullStr Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
title_full_unstemmed Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
title_sort Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arrieta Ramírez, Manuel
author Arrieta Ramírez, Manuel
author_facet Arrieta Ramírez, Manuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv civil repair
suspended sentence
reparación civil
sentencia condenatoria suspendida
topic civil repair
suspended sentence
reparación civil
sentencia condenatoria suspendida
description The work aims to answer the problem that affects a large sector of the primary crime, petty or bagatelle, where the defendants are deprived of their liberty for breach of the rules of conduct imposed in a suspended sentence in its execution or reserve conviction, basically for nonpayment of the civil repair, in spite of being satisfied such payment but postdated. Therefore, it is proposed that the conversion results viable in execution of a guilty verdict, as well as carrying out a weighing trial between two relevant constitutional principles of the same value and hierarchy, such as the principle of immutability of the judged thing vs. principle of humanity of penalties.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/249
10.35292/ropj.v8i10.249
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/249
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v8i10.249
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/249/304
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Manuel Arrieta Ramírez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Manuel Arrieta Ramírez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 8 Núm. 10 (2016); 507-526
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v8i10
reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instacron:CSJ
instname_str Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instacron_str CSJ
institution CSJ
reponame_str Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
collection Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1843353316673716224
score 12.873224
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).