Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System
Descripción del Articulo
This study was partially funded by the Dirección de Gestión de la Investigación at Pontifical Catholic University of Peru and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica del Perú (CONCYTEC from its acronym in Spanish), according to the Convenio de Gestión N° 232-2015-FONDECY...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2017 |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/1202 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/1202 https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0024 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | teaching Last Planner System BIM flowline point-to-point precedence relations takt-time https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.02.00 |
| id |
CONC_35db8703bfc6cd42af071d3136bfbbc6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/1202 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONC |
| network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| repository_id_str |
4689 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| title |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| spellingShingle |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System Brioso, X teaching Last Planner System Last Planner System BIM BIM flowline flowline point-to-point precedence relations point-to-point precedence relations takt-time takt-time https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.02.00 |
| title_short |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| title_full |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| title_fullStr |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| title_sort |
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System |
| author |
Brioso, X |
| author_facet |
Brioso, X Murguia, D Urbina, A |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Murguia, D Urbina, A |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brioso, X Murguia, D Urbina, A |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
teaching |
| topic |
teaching Last Planner System Last Planner System BIM BIM flowline flowline point-to-point precedence relations point-to-point precedence relations takt-time takt-time https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.02.00 |
| dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Last Planner System Last Planner System BIM BIM flowline flowline point-to-point precedence relations point-to-point precedence relations takt-time takt-time |
| dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.02.00 |
| description |
This study was partially funded by the Dirección de Gestión de la Investigación at Pontifical Catholic University of Peru and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica del Perú (CONCYTEC from its acronym in Spanish), according to the Convenio de Gestión N° 232-2015-FONDECYT. We would also like to thank to Dilmer Dueñas, who kindly participated as instructor in the workshops |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/1202 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0024 |
| dc.identifier.isi.none.fl_str_mv |
427301900003 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/1202 https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0024 |
| identifier_str_mv |
427301900003 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Organization Technology and Management in Construction |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sciendo |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sciendo |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
| institution |
CONCYTEC |
| reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
| _version_ |
1844883020606078976 |
| spelling |
Publicationrp01910500rp02039500rp02040500Brioso, XMurguia, DUrbina, A2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2017https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/1202https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0024427301900003This study was partially funded by the Dirección de Gestión de la Investigación at Pontifical Catholic University of Peru and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica del Perú (CONCYTEC from its acronym in Spanish), according to the Convenio de Gestión N° 232-2015-FONDECYT. We would also like to thank to Dilmer Dueñas, who kindly participated as instructor in the workshopsThis article present strategie for teaching scheduling methods such as takt-time, flowlines, and point-to-point precedence relations (PTPPRs) using build-ing information modeling (BIM) models in the Last Planner System. This article is the extended version of the article entitled “Teaching Ta k t-Time, Flowline and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study,” which has been published in Procedia Engineering (Vol. 196, 2017, pages 666–673). A case study is conducted in final year students of civil engineering at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. The mock-up project is an educational building that has high repetitive processes in the struc-tural works phase. First, traditional tools such as Excel spreadsheets and 2D drawings were used to teach produc-tion system design with takt-time, flowlines, and PTPPR. Second, 3D and 4D models with Revit 2016 and Navis-works 2016 were used to integrate the previous schedules with a BIM model and to identify its strengths and weak-nesses. Finally, Vico Office was used for the automation of schedules and comparison of the methods in 4D and 5D. This article describes the lectures, workshops, and simu-lations employed, as well as the feedback from students and researchers. The success of the teaching strategy is reflected in the survey responses from students and the final perceptions of the construction management tools presentedConsejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengSciendoOrganization Technology and Management in Constructioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/teachingLast Planner System-1Last Planner System-1BIM-1BIM-1flowline-1flowline-1point-to-point precedence relations-1point-to-point precedence relations-1takt-time-1takt-time-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.02.00-1Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner Systeminfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#20.500.12390/1202oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/12022024-05-30 15:36:37.451https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="b817c59c-af40-46c5-a082-224af2a08324"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Organization Technology and Management in Construction</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2017</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0024</DOI> <ISI-Number>427301900003</ISI-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Brioso, X</DisplayName> <Person id="rp01910" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Murguia, D</DisplayName> <Person id="rp02039" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Urbina, A</DisplayName> <Person id="rp02040" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Sciendo</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</License> <Keyword>teaching</Keyword> <Keyword>Last Planner System</Keyword> <Keyword>Last Planner System</Keyword> <Keyword>BIM</Keyword> <Keyword>BIM</Keyword> <Keyword>flowline</Keyword> <Keyword>flowline</Keyword> <Keyword>point-to-point precedence relations</Keyword> <Keyword>point-to-point precedence relations</Keyword> <Keyword>takt-time</Keyword> <Keyword>takt-time</Keyword> <Abstract>This article present strategie for teaching scheduling methods such as takt-time, flowlines, and point-to-point precedence relations (PTPPRs) using build-ing information modeling (BIM) models in the Last Planner System. This article is the extended version of the article entitled “Teaching Ta k t-Time, Flowline and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study,” which has been published in Procedia Engineering (Vol. 196, 2017, pages 666–673). A case study is conducted in final year students of civil engineering at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. The mock-up project is an educational building that has high repetitive processes in the struc-tural works phase. First, traditional tools such as Excel spreadsheets and 2D drawings were used to teach produc-tion system design with takt-time, flowlines, and PTPPR. Second, 3D and 4D models with Revit 2016 and Navis-works 2016 were used to integrate the previous schedules with a BIM model and to identify its strengths and weak-nesses. Finally, Vico Office was used for the automation of schedules and comparison of the methods in 4D and 5D. This article describes the lectures, workshops, and simu-lations employed, as well as the feedback from students and researchers. The success of the teaching strategy is reflected in the survey responses from students and the final perceptions of the construction management tools presented</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
| score |
13.394457 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
