The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary
Descripción del Articulo
This paper presents research on the use of the doctrine of jurist Aharon Barak and its influence on the rulings of the Federal Judiciary in Mexico. To this end, a comparative method was used to determine the influence of doctrinal formants. In this regard, the rulings of the Supreme Court of Justice...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/176 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/176 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Doctrina Aharon Barak Proporcionalidad Sentencias Poder Judicial Doctrine Proportionality Judgments Judicial Power |
| id |
CAL-RChorn_5203e5da7ea9b16ff08649db5a7ef23a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/176 |
| network_acronym_str |
CAL-RChorn |
| network_name_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal JudiciaryLa influencia de la doctrina de Aharon Barak en las sentencias del Poder Judicial Federal MexicanoBarreto Nova, Oscar Guillermo DoctrinaAharon BarakProporcionalidadSentenciasPoder JudicialDoctrineAharon BarakProportionalityJudgmentsJudicial PowerThis paper presents research on the use of the doctrine of jurist Aharon Barak and its influence on the rulings of the Federal Judiciary in Mexico. To this end, a comparative method was used to determine the influence of doctrinal formants. In this regard, the rulings of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation and the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary were analyzed to measure the use of his work and determine which topics are addressed in the author's extensive bibliography in order to find the areas where the Federal Judiciary has used his legal theory to find possible theoretical frameworks for resolving judicial problems. It was concluded that, at least in the last seven years, the most widely used works were: i) Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations (English and Spanish versions); and ii) A judge reflects on his work: The role of a constitutional court in a democracy. These texts have essentially served to justify the role of the judge and proportionality in human rights matters.El presente trabajo representa una investigación respecto al uso de la doctrina del jurista Aharon Barak y su influencia en las sentencias del Poder Judicial de la Federación en el Estado mexicano, para lo anterior, se utilizó el lenguaje del método comparativo a efecto de determinar la influencia del formante doctrinal, en este sentido, se analizaron las sentencias de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación y el Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación para medir el uso de su obra y determinar cuáles son los temas abordados dentro de la amplia producción bibliográfica del autor para encontrar las áreas donde el Poder Judicial Federal ha utilizado su teoría jurídica a efecto encontrar posibles marcos teóricos en la resolución de problemas judiciales. Concluyendose que, al menos en los últimos siete años, las obras más utilizadas fueron: i) Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations (versión inglés y español); y, ii) Un juez reflexiona sobre su labor: El papel de un tribunal constitucional en una democracia. Textos que han servido esencialmente para justificar el papel del juez y la proporcionalidad en materia de derechos humanos.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/17610.61542/rjch.176Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 45–56Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 45–562961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/176/152https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1762025-12-30T21:04:19Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary La influencia de la doctrina de Aharon Barak en las sentencias del Poder Judicial Federal Mexicano |
| title |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary |
| spellingShingle |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary Barreto Nova, Oscar Guillermo Doctrina Aharon Barak Proporcionalidad Sentencias Poder Judicial Doctrine Aharon Barak Proportionality Judgments Judicial Power |
| title_short |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary |
| title_full |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary |
| title_fullStr |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary |
| title_sort |
The influence of Aharon Barak's doctrine on the Mexican Federal Judiciary |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Barreto Nova, Oscar Guillermo |
| author |
Barreto Nova, Oscar Guillermo |
| author_facet |
Barreto Nova, Oscar Guillermo |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Doctrina Aharon Barak Proporcionalidad Sentencias Poder Judicial Doctrine Aharon Barak Proportionality Judgments Judicial Power |
| topic |
Doctrina Aharon Barak Proporcionalidad Sentencias Poder Judicial Doctrine Aharon Barak Proportionality Judgments Judicial Power |
| description |
This paper presents research on the use of the doctrine of jurist Aharon Barak and its influence on the rulings of the Federal Judiciary in Mexico. To this end, a comparative method was used to determine the influence of doctrinal formants. In this regard, the rulings of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation and the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary were analyzed to measure the use of his work and determine which topics are addressed in the author's extensive bibliography in order to find the areas where the Federal Judiciary has used his legal theory to find possible theoretical frameworks for resolving judicial problems. It was concluded that, at least in the last seven years, the most widely used works were: i) Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations (English and Spanish versions); and ii) A judge reflects on his work: The role of a constitutional court in a democracy. These texts have essentially served to justify the role of the judge and proportionality in human rights matters. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-30 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/176 10.61542/rjch.176 |
| url |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/176 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.61542/rjch.176 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/176/152 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 45–56 Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 45–56 2961-2934 2961-2926 10.61542/rjch.v3i2 reponame:CAL-Chornancap instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque instacron:CAL |
| instname_str |
Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| instacron_str |
CAL |
| institution |
CAL |
| reponame_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| collection |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1870083422065524736 |
| score |
13.924476 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
