Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator

Descripción del Articulo

The present work is presented as an approach between the notion of the imaginary with the theory of the film viewer, formulated in 1956 by Edgar Morin, in his classic text The cinema or the imaginary man and enlarged by Francesco Casetti with the thesis of the enunciation in the cinema. In this way,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ignacio Riffo, Rubén Dittus
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad Nacional del Altiplano
Repositorio:Revista UNAP - Comuni@cción
Lenguaje:inglés
español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.comunicacionunap.com:article/384
Enlace del recurso:https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:cinema, spectator, imagination, subjectivity, Edgar Morin
id 2226-1478_1de5dcf413b0936ae139135a7f957d72
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.comunicacionunap.com:article/384
network_acronym_str 2226-1478
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista UNAP - Comuni@cción
spelling Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectatorImaginación y cine: la noción de anthropos desde la figura del espectadorIgnacio RiffoRubén Dittuscinema, spectator, imagination, subjectivity, Edgar MorinThe present work is presented as an approach between the notion of the imaginary with the theory of the film viewer, formulated in 1956 by Edgar Morin, in his classic text The cinema or the imaginary man and enlarged by Francesco Casetti with the thesis of the enunciation in the cinema. In this way, the main objective of this article is to capture theoretical bases from the reflection of both conceptualizations. Thus, this initiatory work aims to be an epistemological contribution to future research projects. For this, at the methodological level, an initial theoretical path is developed that has its anchor -and its respective critical reading- in the contributions of Gilbert Durand and Cornelius Castoriadis, in the permanent concern of both for “drawing” those elements inherent in anthropos that allow the construction of their historical-social environment from subjectivity. The latter conceived as intrinsic peculiarity to the human being. It is concluded that through an artificial-imaginary state the viewer feels close and is able to recognize the reality of the images that the big screen offers him, coming into direct contact with his fantasies, fears and dreams. In other words, here the double dimension of the film is observed as an artifact and as a subjective experience.El presente trabajo se plantea como un acercamiento entre la noción del imaginario con la teoría del espectador cinematográfico, formulada en 1956 por Edgar Morin, en su clásico texto El cine o el hombre imaginario y ampliada por Francesco Casetti con la tesis de la enunciación en el cine. De este modo, el objetivo principal de este artículo es plasmar unas bases teóricas provenientes de la reflexión de ambas conceptualizaciones. Así este trabajo iniciático pretende ser un aporte epistemológico para futuros proyectos investigativos. Para ello, a nivel metodológico, se desarrolla un recorrido teórico inicial que tiene su anclaje –y su respectiva lectura crítica- en los aportes de Gilbert Durand y Cornelius Castoriadis, en la permanente preocupación de ambos por “dibujar” aquellos elementos inherentes al anthropos que permiten la construcción de su entorno histórico-social desde la subjetividad. Esta última concebida como particularidad intrínseca al ser humano. Se concluye que a través de un estado artificial-imaginario el espectador se siente cercano y es capaz de reconocer la realidad de las imágenes que la gran pantalla le ofrece, entrando en contacto directo con sus fantasías, miedos y sueños. Dicho de otra manera, aquí se observa la doble dimensión del filme como artefacto y como experiencia subjetiva.Universidad Nacional del Altiplano2019-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/38410.33595/2226-1478.10.2.384Comuni@cción: Journal of Research in Communication and Development; Vol 10 No 2 (2019); 122-130Comuni@cción: Revista de Investigación en Comunicación y Desarrollo; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2019); 122-130Comuni@cción: Revista de Pesquisa em Comunicação e Desenvolvimento; v. 10 n. 2 (2019); 122-1302226-14782219-7168reponame:Revista UNAP - Comuni@ccióninstname:Universidad Nacional del Altiplanoinstacron:UNAPengspahttps://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384/189https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384/195https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384/201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-01-18T15:40:29Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
Imaginación y cine: la noción de anthropos desde la figura del espectador
title Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
spellingShingle Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
Ignacio Riffo
cinema, spectator, imagination, subjectivity, Edgar Morin
title_short Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
title_full Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
title_fullStr Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
title_full_unstemmed Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
title_sort Imagination and cinema: the notion of anthropos from the figure of the spectator
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ignacio Riffo
Rubén Dittus
author Ignacio Riffo
author_facet Ignacio Riffo
Rubén Dittus
author_role author
author2 Rubén Dittus
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv cinema, spectator, imagination, subjectivity, Edgar Morin
topic cinema, spectator, imagination, subjectivity, Edgar Morin
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The present work is presented as an approach between the notion of the imaginary with the theory of the film viewer, formulated in 1956 by Edgar Morin, in his classic text The cinema or the imaginary man and enlarged by Francesco Casetti with the thesis of the enunciation in the cinema. In this way, the main objective of this article is to capture theoretical bases from the reflection of both conceptualizations. Thus, this initiatory work aims to be an epistemological contribution to future research projects. For this, at the methodological level, an initial theoretical path is developed that has its anchor -and its respective critical reading- in the contributions of Gilbert Durand and Cornelius Castoriadis, in the permanent concern of both for “drawing” those elements inherent in anthropos that allow the construction of their historical-social environment from subjectivity. The latter conceived as intrinsic peculiarity to the human being. It is concluded that through an artificial-imaginary state the viewer feels close and is able to recognize the reality of the images that the big screen offers him, coming into direct contact with his fantasies, fears and dreams. In other words, here the double dimension of the film is observed as an artifact and as a subjective experience.
El presente trabajo se plantea como un acercamiento entre la noción del imaginario con la teoría del espectador cinematográfico, formulada en 1956 por Edgar Morin, en su clásico texto El cine o el hombre imaginario y ampliada por Francesco Casetti con la tesis de la enunciación en el cine. De este modo, el objetivo principal de este artículo es plasmar unas bases teóricas provenientes de la reflexión de ambas conceptualizaciones. Así este trabajo iniciático pretende ser un aporte epistemológico para futuros proyectos investigativos. Para ello, a nivel metodológico, se desarrolla un recorrido teórico inicial que tiene su anclaje –y su respectiva lectura crítica- en los aportes de Gilbert Durand y Cornelius Castoriadis, en la permanente preocupación de ambos por “dibujar” aquellos elementos inherentes al anthropos que permiten la construcción de su entorno histórico-social desde la subjetividad. Esta última concebida como particularidad intrínseca al ser humano. Se concluye que a través de un estado artificial-imaginario el espectador se siente cercano y es capaz de reconocer la realidad de las imágenes que la gran pantalla le ofrece, entrando en contacto directo con sus fantasías, miedos y sueños. Dicho de otra manera, aquí se observa la doble dimensión del filme como artefacto y como experiencia subjetiva.
description The present work is presented as an approach between the notion of the imaginary with the theory of the film viewer, formulated in 1956 by Edgar Morin, in his classic text The cinema or the imaginary man and enlarged by Francesco Casetti with the thesis of the enunciation in the cinema. In this way, the main objective of this article is to capture theoretical bases from the reflection of both conceptualizations. Thus, this initiatory work aims to be an epistemological contribution to future research projects. For this, at the methodological level, an initial theoretical path is developed that has its anchor -and its respective critical reading- in the contributions of Gilbert Durand and Cornelius Castoriadis, in the permanent concern of both for “drawing” those elements inherent in anthropos that allow the construction of their historical-social environment from subjectivity. The latter conceived as intrinsic peculiarity to the human being. It is concluded that through an artificial-imaginary state the viewer feels close and is able to recognize the reality of the images that the big screen offers him, coming into direct contact with his fantasies, fears and dreams. In other words, here the double dimension of the film is observed as an artifact and as a subjective experience.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384
10.33595/2226-1478.10.2.384
url https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384
identifier_str_mv 10.33595/2226-1478.10.2.384
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384/189
https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384/195
https://www.comunicacionunap.com/index.php/rev/article/view/384/201
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional del Altiplano
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional del Altiplano
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Comuni@cción: Journal of Research in Communication and Development; Vol 10 No 2 (2019); 122-130
Comuni@cción: Revista de Investigación en Comunicación y Desarrollo; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2019); 122-130
Comuni@cción: Revista de Pesquisa em Comunicação e Desenvolvimento; v. 10 n. 2 (2019); 122-130
2226-1478
2219-7168
reponame:Revista UNAP - Comuni@cción
instname:Universidad Nacional del Altiplano
instacron:UNAP
reponame_str Revista UNAP - Comuni@cción
collection Revista UNAP - Comuni@cción
instname_str Universidad Nacional del Altiplano
instacron_str UNAP
institution UNAP
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701292226852683776
score 13.914502
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).