Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Escati, Lucia, Yanina, Berra, Cornero, Fernando, López, Clara María, Edgardo, Marcos, Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17831
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:tenure
non-traditional animals
perception
risk
tenencia
animales no tradicionales
percepción
riesgo
id 1609-9117_ada02915b38528c45be694c4dd978984
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17831
network_acronym_str 1609-9117
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Tenencia de animales no tradicionales en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
title Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
spellingShingle Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Escati, Lucia
tenure
non-traditional animals
perception
risk
tenencia
animales no tradicionales
percepción
riesgo
title_short Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
title_full Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
title_fullStr Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
title_sort Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Escati, Lucia
Yanina, Berra
Cornero, Fernando
López, Clara María
Edgardo, Marcos
Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge
author Escati, Lucia
author_facet Escati, Lucia
Yanina, Berra
Cornero, Fernando
López, Clara María
Edgardo, Marcos
Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge
author_role author
author2 Yanina, Berra
Cornero, Fernando
López, Clara María
Edgardo, Marcos
Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv tenure
non-traditional animals
perception
risk
tenencia
animales no tradicionales
percepción
riesgo
topic tenure
non-traditional animals
perception
risk
tenencia
animales no tradicionales
percepción
riesgo
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): households in an area of ​​medium socioeconomic level; in a group attending health services (GDS): people who attend the Institute of Zoonoses Dr Luis Pasteur of CABA; and in a group in risk areas (GAR): households in the Costanera Sur settlement "Rodrigo Bueno", a neighbourhood with indexes of unsatisfied basic needs. A total of 140 surveys were conducted in GG, 160 in GDS and 154 in GAR during 2017. The probability of having canine and/or feline together with non-traditional animals was 63.2% (12/19) in GG and 75% (9/12) in GAR. The possession of non-traditional animals was closely related to the customs of people who have settled in urban environments migrating from other provinces, with the need to maintain certain anthropological links and avoid uprooting. Moreover, 5.3% in GG (1/19), 20.0% in GDS (5/25) and 8.3% in GAR (1/12) mentioned that their animal had attacked. No differences were observed between groups on the perception of the risk of disease transmission. They agreed that their animals are not at risk but consider that the risk is high when these animals are in the wild.  
El objetivo del estudio fue conocer las características de la tenencia, motivaciones, percepciones y conductas de la población tenedora de animales no tradicionales en la ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. Se realizó un estudio observacional por encuestas en un grupo general (GG): domicilios en un área de nivel socioeconómico medio; en un grupo demandante de servicios de salud (GDS): personas que concurren al Instituto de Zoonosis Dr. Luis Pasteur de CABA; y en un grupo en áreas de riesgo (GAR): domicilios del asentamiento Costanera Sur “Rodrigo Bueno”, barrio con índices de necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Se estudiaron 140 encuestas en GG, 160 en GDS y 154 en GAR durante 2017. La probabilidad de tener canino y/o felino en forma conjunta con animales no tradicionales fue de 63.2% (12/19) en GG y de 75% (9/12) en GAR. La tenencia de animales no tradicionales está estrechamente relacionada a las costumbres de personas que se han instalado en ambientes urbanos migrando desde otras provincias, con la necesidad de mantener ciertos vínculos antropológicos y evitar desarraigos. El 5.3% en GG (1/19), 20.0% en GDS (5/25) y 8.3% en GAR (1/12) mencionaron que su animal había agredido. No se observaron diferencias entre grupos sobre la percepción del riesgo de transmisión de enfermedades, donde coincidieron que sus animales no presentan riesgo, pero consideran que el riesgo es alto cuando la especie es silvestre.
description The aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): households in an area of ​​medium socioeconomic level; in a group attending health services (GDS): people who attend the Institute of Zoonoses Dr Luis Pasteur of CABA; and in a group in risk areas (GAR): households in the Costanera Sur settlement "Rodrigo Bueno", a neighbourhood with indexes of unsatisfied basic needs. A total of 140 surveys were conducted in GG, 160 in GDS and 154 in GAR during 2017. The probability of having canine and/or feline together with non-traditional animals was 63.2% (12/19) in GG and 75% (9/12) in GAR. The possession of non-traditional animals was closely related to the customs of people who have settled in urban environments migrating from other provinces, with the need to maintain certain anthropological links and avoid uprooting. Moreover, 5.3% in GG (1/19), 20.0% in GDS (5/25) and 8.3% in GAR (1/12) mentioned that their animal had attacked. No differences were observed between groups on the perception of the risk of disease transmission. They agreed that their animals are not at risk but consider that the risk is high when these animals are in the wild.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831
10.15381/rivep.v31i2.17831
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v31i2.17831
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831/15127
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Lucia Escati, Berra Yanina, Fernando Cornero, Clara María López, Marcos Edgardo, Osvaldo Jorge Degregorio
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Lucia Escati, Berra Yanina, Fernando Cornero, Clara María López, Marcos Edgardo, Osvaldo Jorge Degregorio
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 31 No 2 (2020); e17831
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 31 Núm. 2 (2020); e17831
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
reponame_str Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
collection Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701389177127436288
spelling Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTenencia de animales no tradicionales en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaEscati, LuciaYanina, BerraCornero, FernandoLópez, Clara MaríaEdgardo, MarcosDegregorio, Osvaldo Jorgetenurenon-traditional animalsperceptionrisktenenciaanimales no tradicionalespercepciónriesgoThe aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): households in an area of ​​medium socioeconomic level; in a group attending health services (GDS): people who attend the Institute of Zoonoses Dr Luis Pasteur of CABA; and in a group in risk areas (GAR): households in the Costanera Sur settlement "Rodrigo Bueno", a neighbourhood with indexes of unsatisfied basic needs. A total of 140 surveys were conducted in GG, 160 in GDS and 154 in GAR during 2017. The probability of having canine and/or feline together with non-traditional animals was 63.2% (12/19) in GG and 75% (9/12) in GAR. The possession of non-traditional animals was closely related to the customs of people who have settled in urban environments migrating from other provinces, with the need to maintain certain anthropological links and avoid uprooting. Moreover, 5.3% in GG (1/19), 20.0% in GDS (5/25) and 8.3% in GAR (1/12) mentioned that their animal had attacked. No differences were observed between groups on the perception of the risk of disease transmission. They agreed that their animals are not at risk but consider that the risk is high when these animals are in the wild.  El objetivo del estudio fue conocer las características de la tenencia, motivaciones, percepciones y conductas de la población tenedora de animales no tradicionales en la ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. Se realizó un estudio observacional por encuestas en un grupo general (GG): domicilios en un área de nivel socioeconómico medio; en un grupo demandante de servicios de salud (GDS): personas que concurren al Instituto de Zoonosis Dr. Luis Pasteur de CABA; y en un grupo en áreas de riesgo (GAR): domicilios del asentamiento Costanera Sur “Rodrigo Bueno”, barrio con índices de necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Se estudiaron 140 encuestas en GG, 160 en GDS y 154 en GAR durante 2017. La probabilidad de tener canino y/o felino en forma conjunta con animales no tradicionales fue de 63.2% (12/19) en GG y de 75% (9/12) en GAR. La tenencia de animales no tradicionales está estrechamente relacionada a las costumbres de personas que se han instalado en ambientes urbanos migrando desde otras provincias, con la necesidad de mantener ciertos vínculos antropológicos y evitar desarraigos. El 5.3% en GG (1/19), 20.0% en GDS (5/25) y 8.3% en GAR (1/12) mencionaron que su animal había agredido. No se observaron diferencias entre grupos sobre la percepción del riesgo de transmisión de enfermedades, donde coincidieron que sus animales no presentan riesgo, pero consideran que el riesgo es alto cuando la especie es silvestre.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2020-06-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1783110.15381/rivep.v31i2.17831Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 31 No 2 (2020); e17831Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 31 Núm. 2 (2020); e178311682-34191609-9117reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perúinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831/15127Derechos de autor 2020 Lucia Escati, Berra Yanina, Fernando Cornero, Clara María López, Marcos Edgardo, Osvaldo Jorge Degregoriohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T18:10:37Zmail@mail.com -
score 13.882472
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).