Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Descripción del Articulo
The aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): h...
Autores: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17831 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | tenure non-traditional animals perception risk tenencia animales no tradicionales percepción riesgo |
id |
1609-9117_ada02915b38528c45be694c4dd978984 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17831 |
network_acronym_str |
1609-9117 |
repository_id_str |
. |
network_name_str |
Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina Tenencia de animales no tradicionales en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
title |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina Escati, Lucia tenure non-traditional animals perception risk tenencia animales no tradicionales percepción riesgo |
title_short |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
title_full |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
title_sort |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Escati, Lucia Yanina, Berra Cornero, Fernando López, Clara María Edgardo, Marcos Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge |
author |
Escati, Lucia |
author_facet |
Escati, Lucia Yanina, Berra Cornero, Fernando López, Clara María Edgardo, Marcos Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yanina, Berra Cornero, Fernando López, Clara María Edgardo, Marcos Degregorio, Osvaldo Jorge |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
tenure non-traditional animals perception risk tenencia animales no tradicionales percepción riesgo |
topic |
tenure non-traditional animals perception risk tenencia animales no tradicionales percepción riesgo |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): households in an area of medium socioeconomic level; in a group attending health services (GDS): people who attend the Institute of Zoonoses Dr Luis Pasteur of CABA; and in a group in risk areas (GAR): households in the Costanera Sur settlement "Rodrigo Bueno", a neighbourhood with indexes of unsatisfied basic needs. A total of 140 surveys were conducted in GG, 160 in GDS and 154 in GAR during 2017. The probability of having canine and/or feline together with non-traditional animals was 63.2% (12/19) in GG and 75% (9/12) in GAR. The possession of non-traditional animals was closely related to the customs of people who have settled in urban environments migrating from other provinces, with the need to maintain certain anthropological links and avoid uprooting. Moreover, 5.3% in GG (1/19), 20.0% in GDS (5/25) and 8.3% in GAR (1/12) mentioned that their animal had attacked. No differences were observed between groups on the perception of the risk of disease transmission. They agreed that their animals are not at risk but consider that the risk is high when these animals are in the wild. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer las características de la tenencia, motivaciones, percepciones y conductas de la población tenedora de animales no tradicionales en la ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. Se realizó un estudio observacional por encuestas en un grupo general (GG): domicilios en un área de nivel socioeconómico medio; en un grupo demandante de servicios de salud (GDS): personas que concurren al Instituto de Zoonosis Dr. Luis Pasteur de CABA; y en un grupo en áreas de riesgo (GAR): domicilios del asentamiento Costanera Sur “Rodrigo Bueno”, barrio con índices de necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Se estudiaron 140 encuestas en GG, 160 en GDS y 154 en GAR durante 2017. La probabilidad de tener canino y/o felino en forma conjunta con animales no tradicionales fue de 63.2% (12/19) en GG y de 75% (9/12) en GAR. La tenencia de animales no tradicionales está estrechamente relacionada a las costumbres de personas que se han instalado en ambientes urbanos migrando desde otras provincias, con la necesidad de mantener ciertos vínculos antropológicos y evitar desarraigos. El 5.3% en GG (1/19), 20.0% en GDS (5/25) y 8.3% en GAR (1/12) mencionaron que su animal había agredido. No se observaron diferencias entre grupos sobre la percepción del riesgo de transmisión de enfermedades, donde coincidieron que sus animales no presentan riesgo, pero consideran que el riesgo es alto cuando la especie es silvestre. |
description |
The aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): households in an area of medium socioeconomic level; in a group attending health services (GDS): people who attend the Institute of Zoonoses Dr Luis Pasteur of CABA; and in a group in risk areas (GAR): households in the Costanera Sur settlement "Rodrigo Bueno", a neighbourhood with indexes of unsatisfied basic needs. A total of 140 surveys were conducted in GG, 160 in GDS and 154 in GAR during 2017. The probability of having canine and/or feline together with non-traditional animals was 63.2% (12/19) in GG and 75% (9/12) in GAR. The possession of non-traditional animals was closely related to the customs of people who have settled in urban environments migrating from other provinces, with the need to maintain certain anthropological links and avoid uprooting. Moreover, 5.3% in GG (1/19), 20.0% in GDS (5/25) and 8.3% in GAR (1/12) mentioned that their animal had attacked. No differences were observed between groups on the perception of the risk of disease transmission. They agreed that their animals are not at risk but consider that the risk is high when these animals are in the wild. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831 10.15381/rivep.v31i2.17831 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v31i2.17831 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831/15127 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2020 Lucia Escati, Berra Yanina, Fernando Cornero, Clara María López, Marcos Edgardo, Osvaldo Jorge Degregorio http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2020 Lucia Escati, Berra Yanina, Fernando Cornero, Clara María López, Marcos Edgardo, Osvaldo Jorge Degregorio http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 31 No 2 (2020); e17831 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 31 Núm. 2 (2020); e17831 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú |
collection |
Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
_version_ |
1701389177127436288 |
spelling |
Tenure of non-traditional animals in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTenencia de animales no tradicionales en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaEscati, LuciaYanina, BerraCornero, FernandoLópez, Clara MaríaEdgardo, MarcosDegregorio, Osvaldo Jorgetenurenon-traditional animalsperceptionrisktenenciaanimales no tradicionalespercepciónriesgoThe aim of this study was to know the characteristics of the possession, motivations, perceptions and behaviour of the population holding non-traditional animals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. An observational study was conducted through a survey in a general group (GG): households in an area of medium socioeconomic level; in a group attending health services (GDS): people who attend the Institute of Zoonoses Dr Luis Pasteur of CABA; and in a group in risk areas (GAR): households in the Costanera Sur settlement "Rodrigo Bueno", a neighbourhood with indexes of unsatisfied basic needs. A total of 140 surveys were conducted in GG, 160 in GDS and 154 in GAR during 2017. The probability of having canine and/or feline together with non-traditional animals was 63.2% (12/19) in GG and 75% (9/12) in GAR. The possession of non-traditional animals was closely related to the customs of people who have settled in urban environments migrating from other provinces, with the need to maintain certain anthropological links and avoid uprooting. Moreover, 5.3% in GG (1/19), 20.0% in GDS (5/25) and 8.3% in GAR (1/12) mentioned that their animal had attacked. No differences were observed between groups on the perception of the risk of disease transmission. They agreed that their animals are not at risk but consider that the risk is high when these animals are in the wild. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer las características de la tenencia, motivaciones, percepciones y conductas de la población tenedora de animales no tradicionales en la ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina. Se realizó un estudio observacional por encuestas en un grupo general (GG): domicilios en un área de nivel socioeconómico medio; en un grupo demandante de servicios de salud (GDS): personas que concurren al Instituto de Zoonosis Dr. Luis Pasteur de CABA; y en un grupo en áreas de riesgo (GAR): domicilios del asentamiento Costanera Sur “Rodrigo Bueno”, barrio con índices de necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Se estudiaron 140 encuestas en GG, 160 en GDS y 154 en GAR durante 2017. La probabilidad de tener canino y/o felino en forma conjunta con animales no tradicionales fue de 63.2% (12/19) en GG y de 75% (9/12) en GAR. La tenencia de animales no tradicionales está estrechamente relacionada a las costumbres de personas que se han instalado en ambientes urbanos migrando desde otras provincias, con la necesidad de mantener ciertos vínculos antropológicos y evitar desarraigos. El 5.3% en GG (1/19), 20.0% en GDS (5/25) y 8.3% en GAR (1/12) mencionaron que su animal había agredido. No se observaron diferencias entre grupos sobre la percepción del riesgo de transmisión de enfermedades, donde coincidieron que sus animales no presentan riesgo, pero consideran que el riesgo es alto cuando la especie es silvestre.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2020-06-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1783110.15381/rivep.v31i2.17831Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 31 No 2 (2020); e17831Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 31 Núm. 2 (2020); e178311682-34191609-9117reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perúinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17831/15127Derechos de autor 2020 Lucia Escati, Berra Yanina, Fernando Cornero, Clara María López, Marcos Edgardo, Osvaldo Jorge Degregoriohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T18:10:37Zmail@mail.com - |
score |
13.882472 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).