This article argues that the War on Drugs (WOD) is globally unjust because states violate their negative duty to not harm people by imposing a coercive institutional order in which the object of human rights is not secure to all members of society. Using Plan Colombia as a case study and Thomas Pogge’s global justice theory, the article examines how militarized drug strategies, promoted by the United States and adopted by Colombia, have led to human rights violations without achieving the desired goal of ending drug trafficking. The analysis shows that the WOD criminalizes vulnerable communities affected by poverty, state neglect, and armed conflict. Moreover, these policies fail to address the structural causes of drug production and trafficking, reinforce global inequalities rooted in colonial disparities and exploitation, and do not confront the impact of demand from the Global Nort...

This article argues that the War on Drugs (WOD) is globally unjust because states violate their negative duty to not harm people by imposing a coercive institutional order in which the object of human rights is not secure to all members of society. Using Plan Colombia as a case study and Thomas Pogge’s global justice theory, the article examines how militarized drug strategies, promoted by the United States and adopted by Colombia, have led to human rights violations without achieving the desired goal of ending drug trafficking. The analysis shows that the WOD criminalizes vulnerable communities affected by poverty, state neglect, and armed conflict. Moreover, these policies fail to address the structural causes of drug production and trafficking, reinforce global inequalities rooted in colonial disparities and exploitation, and do not confront the impact of demand from the Global Nort...

El arbitraje debe convivir con la justicia ordinaria, pero para que esta convivencia sea armónica, habrá de establecerse una relación de cooperación entre ambos mecanismos a la vez los árbitros deben comprender las limitaciones que les impone su origen convivencial, la falta de imperium y el orden público, hacen necesario que los jueces compartan la idea del arbitraje como sistema que coopera en la solución de conflictos, prestando su auxilio cuando se deba recurrir a ellos para ejecutar el laudo. Si para lograr el pleno reconocimiento de las garantías procesales fundamentales resguardados en el ejercicio de la función jurisdiccional, habrá de considerarse jurisdicción, jurisdicción parcial o jurisdicción restringida en el que permita su acercamiento y reconocimiento que las garantías constitucionales en materia procesal no le es ajena y deberá ajustarse totalmente a ella...