Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
Descripción del Articulo
This study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonl...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
| Repositorio: | UPC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/687666 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687666 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | base shear confined masonry walls Estera 3D limited ductility walls Pushover analysis seismic behavior spectral displacement structural performance https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| id |
UUPC_f4bdd19e99ede6eb53d58166751b79e9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/687666 |
| network_acronym_str |
UUPC |
| network_name_str |
UPC-Institucional |
| repository_id_str |
2670 |
| dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| title |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel base shear confined masonry walls Estera 3D limited ductility walls Pushover analysis seismic behavior spectral displacement structural performance https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| title_short |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| title_full |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| title_sort |
Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú |
| author |
Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel |
| author_facet |
Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel Pabón, Deivy Hernández Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pabón, Deivy Hernández Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel Pabón, Deivy Hernández Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano |
| dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
base shear confined masonry walls Estera 3D limited ductility walls Pushover analysis seismic behavior spectral displacement structural performance |
| topic |
base shear confined masonry walls Estera 3D limited ductility walls Pushover analysis seismic behavior spectral displacement structural performance https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| dc.subject.ocde.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| description |
This study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonlinear static analysis (pushover). Four levels of seismic demand were considered: frequent, occasional, design, and maximum earthquakes. Both systems achieved the same structural performance levels according to code-based criteria: full operation for the frequent earthquake; operation with minor damage for the occasional and design earthquakes; and life safety for the maximum earthquake. However, quantitative results show better performance for the LDW system. For the design earthquake, the LDW system exhibited a maximum base shear of 1141.36 tons and a top-level displacement of 7.098 cm, while the CMW system reached 2371.63 tons and 2.9696 cm, respectively. In terms of spectral acceleration, LDW registered 935.20 gal compared to 1098 gal for CMW. For the maximum earthquake, the LDW system reached a displacement of 10.68 cm and a base shear of 1272.15 tons, whereas the CMW system reached 8.0686 cm and 2291.71 tons. These results indicate that, although both systems meet the established performance objectives, the LDW system demonstrates more efficient structural behavior and greater energy dissipation capacity under severe seismic events. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-16T03:38:45Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-16T03:38:45Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-01 |
| dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.11159/iccste25.354 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687666 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
23693002 |
| dc.identifier.journal.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering |
| dc.identifier.eid.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-105012170309 |
| dc.identifier.scopusid.none.fl_str_mv |
SCOPUS_ID:105012170309 |
| dc.identifier.isni.none.fl_str_mv |
0000 0001 2196 144X |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.11159/iccste25.354 23693002 International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering 2-s2.0-105012170309 SCOPUS_ID:105012170309 0000 0001 2196 144X |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687666 |
| dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Attribution 4.0 International |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Avestia Publishing |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:UPC-Institucional instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas instacron:UPC |
| instname_str |
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
| instacron_str |
UPC |
| institution |
UPC |
| reponame_str |
UPC-Institucional |
| collection |
UPC-Institucional |
| dc.source.journaltitle.none.fl_str_mv |
International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/3/license.txt https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/2/license_rdf https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/1/ICCSTE_354.pdf |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108 4097d8bd14b3800574cc900e03b2595f |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Académico UPC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
upc@openrepository.com |
| _version_ |
1852407022255865856 |
| spelling |
557eb35865bc4057101954caaea1710a5008f7c36fe6c48ae6e6072e0b67874239d3000b323e8ba67627b5ade3bda9e5f0090a300c32fbd76dcff62fce87ae469794bf21cBendezu Romero, Lenin MiguelPabón, Deivy HernándezRufino, Yedsem NuñezLazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano2025-12-16T03:38:45Z2025-12-16T03:38:45Z2025-01-0110.11159/iccste25.354http://hdl.handle.net/10757/68766623693002International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering2-s2.0-105012170309SCOPUS_ID:1050121703090000 0001 2196 144XThis study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonlinear static analysis (pushover). Four levels of seismic demand were considered: frequent, occasional, design, and maximum earthquakes. Both systems achieved the same structural performance levels according to code-based criteria: full operation for the frequent earthquake; operation with minor damage for the occasional and design earthquakes; and life safety for the maximum earthquake. However, quantitative results show better performance for the LDW system. For the design earthquake, the LDW system exhibited a maximum base shear of 1141.36 tons and a top-level displacement of 7.098 cm, while the CMW system reached 2371.63 tons and 2.9696 cm, respectively. In terms of spectral acceleration, LDW registered 935.20 gal compared to 1098 gal for CMW. For the maximum earthquake, the LDW system reached a displacement of 10.68 cm and a base shear of 1272.15 tons, whereas the CMW system reached 8.0686 cm and 2291.71 tons. These results indicate that, although both systems meet the established performance objectives, the LDW system demonstrates more efficient structural behavior and greater energy dissipation capacity under severe seismic events.application/pdfengAvestia Publishinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/base shearconfined masonry wallsEstera 3Dlimited ductility wallsPushover analysisseismic behaviorspectral displacementstructural performancehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perúinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleInternational Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineeringreponame:UPC-Institucionalinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPC2025-12-16T03:38:47ZLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8908https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/2/license_rdf0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108MD52falseORIGINALICCSTE_354.pdfICCSTE_354.pdfapplication/pdf532104https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/1/ICCSTE_354.pdf4097d8bd14b3800574cc900e03b2595fMD51true10757/687666oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/6876662025-12-16 03:38:47.417Repositorio Académico UPCupc@openrepository.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 |
| score |
13.407357 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).