Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú

Descripción del Articulo

This study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel, Pabón, Deivy Hernández, Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez, Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Repositorio:UPC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/687666
Enlace del recurso:http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687666
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:base shear
confined masonry walls
Estera 3D
limited ductility walls
Pushover analysis
seismic behavior
spectral displacement
structural performance
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00
id UUPC_f4bdd19e99ede6eb53d58166751b79e9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/687666
network_acronym_str UUPC
network_name_str UPC-Institucional
repository_id_str 2670
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
title Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
spellingShingle Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel
base shear
confined masonry walls
Estera 3D
limited ductility walls
Pushover analysis
seismic behavior
spectral displacement
structural performance
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00
title_short Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
title_full Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
title_fullStr Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
title_sort Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
author Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel
author_facet Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel
Pabón, Deivy Hernández
Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez
Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano
author_role author
author2 Pabón, Deivy Hernández
Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez
Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bendezu Romero, Lenin Miguel
Pabón, Deivy Hernández
Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez
Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv base shear
confined masonry walls
Estera 3D
limited ductility walls
Pushover analysis
seismic behavior
spectral displacement
structural performance
topic base shear
confined masonry walls
Estera 3D
limited ductility walls
Pushover analysis
seismic behavior
spectral displacement
structural performance
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00
dc.subject.ocde.es_PE.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00
description This study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonlinear static analysis (pushover). Four levels of seismic demand were considered: frequent, occasional, design, and maximum earthquakes. Both systems achieved the same structural performance levels according to code-based criteria: full operation for the frequent earthquake; operation with minor damage for the occasional and design earthquakes; and life safety for the maximum earthquake. However, quantitative results show better performance for the LDW system. For the design earthquake, the LDW system exhibited a maximum base shear of 1141.36 tons and a top-level displacement of 7.098 cm, while the CMW system reached 2371.63 tons and 2.9696 cm, respectively. In terms of spectral acceleration, LDW registered 935.20 gal compared to 1098 gal for CMW. For the maximum earthquake, the LDW system reached a displacement of 10.68 cm and a base shear of 1272.15 tons, whereas the CMW system reached 8.0686 cm and 2291.71 tons. These results indicate that, although both systems meet the established performance objectives, the LDW system demonstrates more efficient structural behavior and greater energy dissipation capacity under severe seismic events.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-16T03:38:45Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-16T03:38:45Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2025-01-01
dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.11159/iccste25.354
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687666
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 23693002
dc.identifier.journal.es_PE.fl_str_mv International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering
dc.identifier.eid.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-105012170309
dc.identifier.scopusid.none.fl_str_mv SCOPUS_ID:105012170309
dc.identifier.isni.none.fl_str_mv 0000 0001 2196 144X
identifier_str_mv 10.11159/iccste25.354
23693002
International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering
2-s2.0-105012170309
SCOPUS_ID:105012170309
0000 0001 2196 144X
url http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687666
dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv Avestia Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:UPC-Institucional
instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron:UPC
instname_str Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron_str UPC
institution UPC
reponame_str UPC-Institucional
collection UPC-Institucional
dc.source.journaltitle.none.fl_str_mv International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/3/license.txt
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/2/license_rdf
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/1/ICCSTE_354.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108
4097d8bd14b3800574cc900e03b2595f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Académico UPC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv upc@openrepository.com
_version_ 1852407022255865856
spelling 557eb35865bc4057101954caaea1710a5008f7c36fe6c48ae6e6072e0b67874239d3000b323e8ba67627b5ade3bda9e5f0090a300c32fbd76dcff62fce87ae469794bf21cBendezu Romero, Lenin MiguelPabón, Deivy HernándezRufino, Yedsem NuñezLazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano2025-12-16T03:38:45Z2025-12-16T03:38:45Z2025-01-0110.11159/iccste25.354http://hdl.handle.net/10757/68766623693002International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering2-s2.0-105012170309SCOPUS_ID:1050121703090000 0001 2196 144XThis study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonlinear static analysis (pushover). Four levels of seismic demand were considered: frequent, occasional, design, and maximum earthquakes. Both systems achieved the same structural performance levels according to code-based criteria: full operation for the frequent earthquake; operation with minor damage for the occasional and design earthquakes; and life safety for the maximum earthquake. However, quantitative results show better performance for the LDW system. For the design earthquake, the LDW system exhibited a maximum base shear of 1141.36 tons and a top-level displacement of 7.098 cm, while the CMW system reached 2371.63 tons and 2.9696 cm, respectively. In terms of spectral acceleration, LDW registered 935.20 gal compared to 1098 gal for CMW. For the maximum earthquake, the LDW system reached a displacement of 10.68 cm and a base shear of 1272.15 tons, whereas the CMW system reached 8.0686 cm and 2291.71 tons. These results indicate that, although both systems meet the established performance objectives, the LDW system demonstrates more efficient structural behavior and greater energy dissipation capacity under severe seismic events.application/pdfengAvestia Publishinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/base shearconfined masonry wallsEstera 3Dlimited ductility wallsPushover analysisseismic behaviorspectral displacementstructural performancehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perúinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleInternational Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineeringreponame:UPC-Institucionalinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPC2025-12-16T03:38:47ZLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8908https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/2/license_rdf0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108MD52falseORIGINALICCSTE_354.pdfICCSTE_354.pdfapplication/pdf532104https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/687666/1/ICCSTE_354.pdf4097d8bd14b3800574cc900e03b2595fMD51true10757/687666oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/6876662025-12-16 03:38:47.417Repositorio Académico UPCupc@openrepository.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
score 13.407357
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).