Exportación Completada — 

EFL Teachers’ Corrective Feedback and Students’ Revision in a Peruvian University: A descriptive study

Descripción del Articulo

This study explored the EFL teachers’ written corrective feedback (CF) techniques and their EFL students’ ability to integrate the CF while revising their texts. A total of 72 EFL students and 4 EFL teachers participated in this study. The data were collected through explicitation interviews adminis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lira Gonzales, Maria Lourdes, Lira de Tejeda, Martha, Tolentino Krous, Janna, Vasquez, Dora
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:USIL-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.usil.edu.pe:usil/3239
Enlace del recurso:https://repositorio.usil.edu.pe/handle/usil/3239
http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_60809.html
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Written language
Foreign languages
Language instruction
Enseñanza de idiomas
Enseñanza de una segunda lengua
Descripción
Sumario:This study explored the EFL teachers’ written corrective feedback (CF) techniques and their EFL students’ ability to integrate the CF while revising their texts. A total of 72 EFL students and 4 EFL teachers participated in this study. The data were collected through explicitation interviews administered to teachers and students, as well as through students’ written productions. A content analysis was carried out employing three pre-established categories: types of students’ errors (Guénette & Lyster, 2013), types of teachers’ feedback (Guénette, 2010), and types of students’ revisions (Ferris, 2006). Results showed that error identification with error code was the most frequent type of written CF used by the two teachers in the pre intermediate groups and one of the teachers in the upper intermediate group; whereas, the other teacher in the upper intermediate group used mainly direct error correction without comment when providing feedback. In addition, results showed that although students from different levels undertook revisions of their errors in different ways, most were ultimately able to correct their errors
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).