Analysis of the geomechanical behavior of the rock mass in gallery level 4040, Victoria mine

Descripción del Articulo

The trend in countries with experience in mining exploitation is to have safe practices to conserve their most valuable resource, their personnel; For this reason, we set ourselves the objective of determining the geomechanical behavior of the rock mass analyzed through geomechanical classifications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Catalan-Mendoza, David Francisco, Cardenas-Catalan, Jose Adolfo, Mollocondo-Flores, Wilson John, Catalán-Mendoza, David Francisco, Cárdenas-Catalán, José Adolfo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurímac
Repositorio:UNMB-Riqchary
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.unamba.edu.pe:article/27
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unamba.edu.pe/index.php/riqchary/article/view/27
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:clasificación geomecánica
macizo rocoso
resistencia
teoría de Meyerhof
geomechanical classification
rock mass
strength
Meyerhof theory
Descripción
Sumario:The trend in countries with experience in mining exploitation is to have safe practices to conserve their most valuable resource, their personnel; For this reason, we set ourselves the objective of determining the geomechanical behavior of the rock mass analyzed through geomechanical classifications gallery level 4040 in the Victoria mine, Andahuaylas 2021; The study is of applied type, level; descriptive – explanatory. The results were obtained by applying computer programs such as Roclab, Dips and Phases; the RMR value (corrected) is 48, which qualifies as regular; which means that in excavation such as pilot cut and benching with 1.5 to 3 m of advance in the pilot cut, the rock bolts must be systematic bolts of 4 m, 1.5-2 m spacing on the ceiling and walls with welded mesh; the concrete thrown from 50 to 100 mm on the roof and 30 mm on the sides. The investigation concludes that in slope areas in structural domain (D.E) 1 there is no risk since there are no poles, in D.E 4 there is a concentration of poles therefore the possibility of landslide. In tunnel structures in D.E 2 there is no overturning or overturning, in D.E 3 and 5 there are wedges since in the first case shotcrete must be applied, and for the second case a thin layer of shotcrete must be applied.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).