Impactos ambientales y socioeconómicos de los proyectos de desarrollo agrícolas en Comunidad Etnia Tikuna, sector Yanayacu. Caballococha. Loreto 2024

• Autor: Tuesta Urquia, Jackelin
• Formato: tesis de grado
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
• Repositorio: UNAPIquitos-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/10735
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/10735
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Desarrollo agrícola; Proyectos de desarrollo; Impacto ambiental; Impacto socioeconómico; Comunidad local; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01

Non-experimental quantitative study of the exploratory - descriptive, cross-sectional type. The primary information will be obtained through the application of a structured interview to 108 beneficiaries of development projects of the Nueva Galilea CCNN of Callarú, San José de Yanayacu CCNN and Cahuide CCNN of the Tikuna ethnic group. With a Cronbach's Alpha reliability of 0.799, while the normality of the data was determined with the Kolmogorov Smirnov test, for which the Rho Spearman statistical test was used, which allowed us to conclude: that the development projects implemented in the Tikuna community , are mainly oriented to the promotion of agriculture as an economic alternative to extractive or illicit activities, which has generated a disconnection between the planned objectives and the real needs of the beneficiary communities; generating deforestation and soil degradation that have negatively affected local biodiversity and water sources, which is evident in the decrease in fishing and hunting. The lack of a more robust environmental approach has allowed projects to prioritize productive growth without adopting sustainable practices, exacerbating the loss of key natural resources. Likewise, the socioeconomic impacts have not managed to generate significant improvements in the quality of life of the Tikuna community; the results show that they have contributed to greater pressure on natural resources, the loss of cultural traditions and a weakening of social organization. But likewise, the Tikuna communities have developed resistance and adaptation strategies against negative impacts such as community mobilization and defense of the territory through participation in consultation and negotiation processes, which are insufficient. It is crucial to promote greater inclusion of communities in decision-making, as well as strengthening their capacities to manage and mitigate adverse effects and stronger support from the State.