Determining the geodetic mass balance of the Znosko glacier (King George Island, Antarctica) using an unmanned aerial vehicle

Descripción del Articulo

In the last decade, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been used for scientific research specially for glaciological applications in Antarctica. In the study an UAV was used to detect changes in Znosko glacier surface, map the glacier contour, snow line and estimate the geodetic mass balance. Znos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Bello, Cinthya, Suarez, Wilson, Brondi, Fabian
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología del Perú
Repositorio:SENAMHI-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.senamhi.gob.pe:20.500.12542/2608
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12542/2608
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Glacier
Antarctica
Mass Balance
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.11
temperatura - Clima y Eventos Naturales
Descripción
Sumario:In the last decade, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been used for scientific research specially for glaciological applications in Antarctica. In the study an UAV was used to detect changes in Znosko glacier surface, map the glacier contour, snow line and estimate the geodetic mass balance. Znosko glacier (ZG) located in King George Island (KGI), Antarctic Peninsula has an estimated total area of 1.77 km2 (January 2020), a length of 1.9 km and maximum elevation of 300 metres above sea level (m a.s.l.). The aerial photogrammetric survey was carried out in two field campaigns (austral summer 2019 and 2020) during the XXVI and XXVII Peruvian Antarctic Operation using a Quadcopter for image acquisition. Our findings reveal a negative geodetic mass balance for the periods 2019–2012, 2020–2019 and 2020–2012 with −15.25, −2.76 and −17.97 metre water equivalent (m w.e.) respectively. Analysis of these datasets confirm a mass loss with a heterogeneous pattern between accumulation and ablation zone. Furthermore, glacier outlines reveal that ZG front has lost approximately 3% of its area between 2012 and 2020 by calving effect.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).