Mathematical Generalization of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) and Their Variants.

• Autores: Becerra-Suarez, F.L., Borrero-Ramírez, A.G., Valencia-Castillo, E., Forero, M.G.
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca
• Repositorio: UNC-Institucional
• Lenguaje: inglés
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.unc.edu.pe:20.500.14074/9817
• Enlace del recurso: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14074/9817; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13193128
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks; neural networks; interpretability; machine learning; deep learning; function approximation; computational efficiency; nonlinear functions; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.01.02

Neural networks have become a fundamental tool for solving complex problems, from image processing and speech recognition to time series prediction and large-scale data classification. However, traditional neural architectures suffer from interpretability problems due to their opaque representations and lack of explicit interaction between linear and nonlinear transformations. To address these limitations, Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks (KAN) have emerged as a mathematically grounded approach capable of efficiently representing complex nonlinear functions. Based on the principles established by Kolmogorov and Arnold, KAN offer an alternative to traditional architectures, mitigating issues such as overfitting and lack of interpretability. Despite their solid theoretical basis, practical implementations of KAN face challenges, such as optimal function selection and computational efficiency. This paper provides a systematic review that goes beyond previous surveys by consolidating the diverse structural variants of KAN (e.g., Wavelet-KAN, Rational-KAN, MonoKAN, Physics-KAN, Linear Spline KAN, and Orthogonal Polynomial KAN) into a unified framework. In addition, we emphasize their mathematical foundations, compare their advantages and limitations, and discuss their applicability across domains. From this review, three main conclusions can be drawn: (i) spline-based KAN remain the most widely used due to their stability and simplicity, (ii) rational and wavelet-based variants provide greater expressivity but introduce numerical challenges, and (iii) emerging approaches such as Physics-KAN and automatic basis selection open promising directions for scalability and interpretability. These insights provide a benchmark for future research and practical implementations of KAN.