El pedestal y la jaula: movilización feminista por la igualdad y la disputa por los significados constitucionales en los Estados Unidos de América en las décadas de 1960 y 1970

• Autor: Zara, Nicolás Daniel
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2022
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/186403
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/25273/23845; https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/25273/24082; https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/25273/24083; https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202201.004
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Equality; Democratic constitutionalism; Feminism; Social movements; Equal Rights Amendment; Strategic litigation; Legal mobilization; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional culture; Popular interpretation of the constitution; Igualdad; Constitucionalismo democrático; Feminismo; Movimientos sociales; Enmienda de Igualdad de Derechos; Litigio estratégico; Movilización legal; Interpretación constitucional; Cultura constitucional; Interpretación popular de la constitución; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

This article aims to propose a reframing of certain aspects of feminist mobilization for equality in the United States of America in the decades of 1960 and 1970, considering some elements of social movements theory and democratic constitutionalism. It analyzes the ways in which the feminist movement’s narrative succeeded in permeating in the constitutional culture of the United States, changing through it the meaning of the U.S. Constitution. In doing so, it focuses on the strategies used by legal feminism in constitutional litigation, on the efforts for the sanction of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), and on the interactions between both processes. It addresses the recent revival of the ERA, as well as its text’s shortcomings. Finally, based on the analysis carried out in previous sections, it provides some arguments in support of a new alternative to the old ERA.