José María Arguedas y el indigenismo revolucionario guatemalteco (1951-1961)

Descripción del Articulo

This paper explores José María Arguedas’ thoughts about the Indigenista policies during the October Revolution (1944-1954) in Guatemala. After listening to the Guatemalan anthropologist Antonio Goubaud Carrera in 1951, Arguedas and other Latin American intellectuals discussed the Indigenista researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Palencia Frener, Sergio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/205214
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/29404/28394
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/205214
https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.202502.013
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Indigenism
Folklore
Revolution
Peru
Guatemala
Indigenismo
Revolución
Perú
Arte popular
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.04.03
Descripción
Sumario:This paper explores José María Arguedas’ thoughts about the Indigenista policies during the October Revolution (1944-1954) in Guatemala. After listening to the Guatemalan anthropologist Antonio Goubaud Carrera in 1951, Arguedas and other Latin American intellectuals discussed the Indigenista research and policies in Guatemala. Drawing from two publications by Arguedas in 1953 and 1959, and archival research at the Guatemalan National Indigenista Institute and the International Labour Organization (ILO), this essay studies José María Arguedas’ interest and reflections about Goubaud and the Indigenista policies led by Guatemalan anthropologist Joaquín Noval. This article examines Arguedas research on “folk art” and “popular art” in Peru in relation to the Guatemalan revolutionary Indigenismo and his later critique of the commodification and technification of folk creation. By reconstructing biographical, political, and academic aspects in Arguedas’ life, this essay ultimately analyzes his decision to carry on ethnographic fieldwork in Guatemala in 1961. Overall, this paper discusses the little-known relationship between Arguedas and Guatemala, a standpoint that decentralizes the history of anthropology and Latin American intellectual networks.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).