Influence of obstacle separation distance on the acceleration of premixed methane/air flames in a closed channel

• Autores: Valencia, Sebastian, Illacanchi, Fernando, Azevedo, Lucas De, Mendiburu, Andres Z., Bravo, Luis, Khare, Prashant, Celis, Cesar
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: inglés
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/205122
• Enlace del recurso: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/205122; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-025-00691-2
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Flame acceleration; Obstacle separation; Methane/air mixture; Experiments; Numerical modeling; Metanol; Combustibles; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.03.00

Flame acceleration plays an important role in determining the onset of deflagration-to-det­onation transition (DDT) phenomenon that is relevant to novel pressure-gain propulsion and explosion safety research. Accordingly, this work explores the influence of the separa­tion distance between obstacles (S) inside a 1050 mm closed duct on the acceleration of premixed flames fueled by a stoichiometric methane/air mixture at 40 kPa pressure. The studied duct geometry features a 96 mm x 96 mm square cross section and includes five obstacles along the wall with a 75% blockage ratio, each delineated by side dimensions of 96 mm x 96 mm and square holes of 48 mm x 48 mm. Experimental and direct numerical simulations (DNS) techniques are employed here to investigate the flame acceleration dy­namics under different operating conditions. More specifically, high-speed video captures the dynamics of the flame front evolution from experiments, while DNS are carried out using the PeleC fully compressive Navier Stokes solver, including finite-rate chemistry and adaptive mesh refinement (AMR). A comparison between experimental and numerical results for S = 1.0 Dₕ shows reasonable agreement in flame tip velocity and reduced posi­tion, supporting the applicability of a two-dimensional DNS model like the one employed here. In contrast, for S = 1.5 Dₕ the numerical results fail to reproduce the experimentally observed flame structure and acceleration, likely due to missing three-dimensional effects. Numerical simulations for different S values ranging from 0.75 to 1.5 Dₕ reveal that ob­stacle spacing has a strong influence on flame acceleration mechanisms. As S increases indeed, the flame shifts from geometry-constrained jetting to instability-driven propaga­tion involving vortex generation and pressure-wave interactions. The case with S = 1.25 Dₕ yields the highest flame tip velocity, even though the one with S = 1.5 Dₕ exhibits greater vorticity and pressure amplitudes. This is attributed to the reduced flame–vortex coupling coherence in the S = 1.5 Dₕ case, which results in more chaotic flame dynamics and lower flame acceleration efficiency. These results offer new insight into the mechanisms of flame acceleration under confinement and highlight obstacle spacing as a key design parameter for optimizing performance and safety in combustion systems.