¿Qué es convivir en pareja? Los supuestos espaciales de la Corte Suprema colombiana en casos de pensión de sobrevivientes

• Autor: Rodríguez Morales, Andrés
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/199890
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/28875/26430; https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202401.006
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Survivor’s pensions; Domestic partnership; Sexual relations; Spatial assumptions; Legal geography; Evidence law; Pensión de sobrevivientes; Convivencia en pareja; Relaciones sexuales; Supuestos espaciales; Geografía legal; Derecho probatorio; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

In this article I use legal geography to analyze the way in which the jurisprudence of the Labor Cassation Chamber of the Colombian Supreme Court of Justice assumes spatial imaginaries on the evidentiary standard of cohabitation as a couple. The factual pattern chosen is the study of the possible recognition of the survivor’s pension for the partner of the deceased; therefore, I present two arguments. First, that the spatial assumptions on which the concept of cohabitation as a couple is built are contradictory. Secondly, that when it comes to the existence of sexual relations within the framework of the couple’s relationship, the Supreme Court uses the public/private binary, traditionally used to oppress women, to emancipate them.