Who monitors the monitor? Effect of Party Observers on Electoral Outcomes

Descripción del Articulo

We ask how monitoring by individuals with preferences regarding the outcome of the supervised task interferes with the task's process: do the monitors' presence biases the results in favor of their own preferences? To do that, we construct a novel dataset from the raw voting records of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Casas, Agustín, Díaz, Guillermo, Trindade, Andre
Formato: documento de trabajo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/166776
Enlace del recurso:https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/166776
http://dx.doi.org/10.7835/ccwp-2015-08-0011
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
Descripción
Sumario:We ask how monitoring by individuals with preferences regarding the outcome of the supervised task interferes with the task's process: do the monitors' presence biases the results in favor of their own preferences? To do that, we construct a novel dataset from the raw voting records of the 2011 national elections in Argentina. We exploit a natural experiment to show that electoral observers with partisan preferences cause a 1.7% to 7% increase in the vote count of the observers' preferred party. This bias, which appears under various electoral rules, concentrates in municipalities with lower civic capital (Guiso et al. (2011)) and weakens the accountability role of elections.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).