The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood

Descripción del Articulo

At Sophist 260e3-261a2, the Eleatic Stranger claims that in order to demonstrate that falsehood is, he and Theaetetus must first track down what speech (logos), opinion (doxa), and appearance (phantasia) are, and then observe the communion (koinōnia) that speech, opinion, and appearance have with no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Wiitala, Michael
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/185794
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/25069/23762
https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.199901-02.010
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Falsehood
false statement
Non-being
Truth
Plato
Sophist
Koinōniai
Logos
Falsedad
Afirmación falsa
No-ser
Verdad
Platón
Sofista
Koinōníai
Lógos
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01
id RPUC_63edc95c17c0278cfdf9df26296d38db
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/185794
network_acronym_str RPUC
network_name_str PUCP-Institucional
repository_id_str 2905
spelling Wiitala, Michael2022-07-18T22:42:00Z2022-07-18T23:20:27Z2022-07-18T22:42:00Z2022-07-18T23:20:27Z2022-03-28http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/25069/23762https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.199901-02.010At Sophist 260e3-261a2, the Eleatic Stranger claims that in order to demonstrate that falsehood is, he and Theaetetus must first track down what speech (logos), opinion (doxa), and appearance (phantasia) are, and then observe the communion (koinōnia) that speech, opinion, and appearance have with non-being. The Stranger, however, never explicitly discusses the communion of speech, opinion, and appearance with non-being. Yet presumably their communion is implicit in his account of falsehood, given his claim that observing that communion is needed in order to demonstrate that falsehood is (260e5-a2). This essay seeks to make the communion that speech has with non-being explicit. I argue that speech has communion with non-being in that the things and actions speech combines together by means of nouns and verbs need not be combined in a way that reveals (δηλοῖ) how the being a given speech is about combines ontologically with other beings.En el Sofista 260e3-261a2, el Extranjero eleático afirma que para demostrar que la falsedad es, él y Teeteto deben primero rastrear qué son el habla (lógos), la opinión (dóxa) y la apariencia (phantasía), y luego observar la comunión (koinōnía) que el habla, la opinión y la apariencia tienen con el no-ser. El extranjero, sin embargo, nunca discute explícitamente la comunión del habla, la opinión y la apariencia con el no-ser. No obstante, se presume que dicha comunión es implícita en su explicación de la falsedad, dada su afirmación de que se necesita observar esta comunión para demostrar que la falsedad es (260e5-a2). Este artículo busca hacer explícita la comunión que el habla tiene con el no-ser. Sostengo que el habla tiene comunión con el no-ser en el sentido de que las cosas y las acciones que este combina entre sí por medio de sustantivos y verbos no necesitan combinarse de modo tal que revele (δηλοῖ) cómo el ser de un discurso dado se combina ontológicamente con otros seres.application/pdfengPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Departamento de HumanidadesPEurn:issn:2223-3741urn:issn:1016-913Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Areté; Vol. 34 (2022): Número extraordinarioreponame:PUCP-Institucionalinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPFalsehoodfalse statementNon-beingTruthPlatoSophistKoinōniaiLogosFalsedadAfirmación falsaNo-serVerdadPlatónSofistaKoinōníaiLógoshttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehoodinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo20.500.14657/185794oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/1857942024-06-04 15:59:46.555https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessmetadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.pucp.edu.peRepositorio Institucional de la PUCPrepositorio@pucp.pe
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
title The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
spellingShingle The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
Wiitala, Michael
Falsehood
false statement
Non-being
Truth
Plato
Sophist
Koinōniai
Logos
Falsedad
Afirmación falsa
No-ser
Verdad
Platón
Sofista
Koinōníai
Lógos
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01
title_short The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
title_full The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
title_fullStr The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
title_full_unstemmed The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
title_sort The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood
author Wiitala, Michael
author_facet Wiitala, Michael
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wiitala, Michael
dc.subject.en_US.fl_str_mv Falsehood
false statement
Non-being
Truth
Plato
Sophist
Koinōniai
Logos
topic Falsehood
false statement
Non-being
Truth
Plato
Sophist
Koinōniai
Logos
Falsedad
Afirmación falsa
No-ser
Verdad
Platón
Sofista
Koinōníai
Lógos
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv Falsedad
Afirmación falsa
No-ser
Verdad
Platón
Sofista
Koinōníai
Lógos
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01
description At Sophist 260e3-261a2, the Eleatic Stranger claims that in order to demonstrate that falsehood is, he and Theaetetus must first track down what speech (logos), opinion (doxa), and appearance (phantasia) are, and then observe the communion (koinōnia) that speech, opinion, and appearance have with non-being. The Stranger, however, never explicitly discusses the communion of speech, opinion, and appearance with non-being. Yet presumably their communion is implicit in his account of falsehood, given his claim that observing that communion is needed in order to demonstrate that falsehood is (260e5-a2). This essay seeks to make the communion that speech has with non-being explicit. I argue that speech has communion with non-being in that the things and actions speech combines together by means of nouns and verbs need not be combined in a way that reveals (δηλοῖ) how the being a given speech is about combines ontologically with other beings.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-18T22:42:00Z
2022-07-18T23:20:27Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-18T22:42:00Z
2022-07-18T23:20:27Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-03-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/25069/23762
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.199901-02.010
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/25069/23762
https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.199901-02.010
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv urn:issn:2223-3741
urn:issn:1016-913X
dc.rights.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Departamento de Humanidades
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv PE
dc.source.es_ES.fl_str_mv Areté; Vol. 34 (2022): Número extraordinario
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:PUCP-Institucional
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str PUCP-Institucional
collection PUCP-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la PUCP
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@pucp.pe
_version_ 1835639092855963648
score 13.889614
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).