Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior

Descripción del Articulo

The purpose of this essay is to analyze legal proposals and public policies related to the entry and permanence of students with special educational needs in higher education, within a Latin American context that includes Mexico and Brazil. To conduct a comparative study, we use a historical-documen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hora, Júnio, Bazilatto, Alexandre, Pantaleão, Edson
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/194432
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867/25130
https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/194432
https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202301.003
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Special education
Higher education
Legislation
Public policy
Comparative study
Educación especial
Educación superior
Legislación
Políticas públicas
Estudio comparativo
Educação especial
Educação superior
Legislação
Estudo comparado
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00
id RPUC_63117a5ec45026ce44930f92b8bffce9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/194432
network_acronym_str RPUC
network_name_str PUCP-Institucional
repository_id_str 2905
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
dc.title.alternative.en_US.fl_str_mv Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Legislações e políticas públicas: um estudo comparado internacional em Educação Especial na Educação Superior
title Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
spellingShingle Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
Hora, Júnio
Special education
Higher education
Legislation
Public policy
Comparative study
Educación especial
Educación superior
Legislación
Políticas públicas
Estudio comparativo
Educação especial
Educação superior
Legislação
Políticas públicas
Estudo comparado
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00
title_short Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
title_full Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
title_fullStr Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
title_full_unstemmed Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
title_sort Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior
author Hora, Júnio
author_facet Hora, Júnio
Bazilatto, Alexandre
Pantaleão, Edson
author_role author
author2 Bazilatto, Alexandre
Pantaleão, Edson
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hora, Júnio
Bazilatto, Alexandre
Pantaleão, Edson
dc.subject.en_US.fl_str_mv Special education
Higher education
Legislation
Public policy
Comparative study
topic Special education
Higher education
Legislation
Public policy
Comparative study
Educación especial
Educación superior
Legislación
Políticas públicas
Estudio comparativo
Educação especial
Educação superior
Legislação
Políticas públicas
Estudo comparado
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv Educación especial
Educación superior
Legislación
Políticas públicas
Estudio comparativo
dc.subject.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Educação especial
Educação superior
Legislação
Políticas públicas
Estudo comparado
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00
description The purpose of this essay is to analyze legal proposals and public policies related to the entry and permanence of students with special educational needs in higher education, within a Latin American context that includes Mexico and Brazil. To conduct a comparative study, we use a historical-documentary methodology that examines educational legislation and its impact on public policies between 1996 and 2018. Our theoretical perspective is based on the concept of Civilizing Processes, as developed by Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011). This perspective emphasizes how societies utilize social relations between different groups to form their constitution and interdependence processes, which in turn impact the actions of individuals as well as the state institutions that govern them. The data we present in this essay show that Mexico and Brazil have established legal frameworks that recognize the rights of students with special educational needs to access higher education. However, we also question the extent to which these legal documents are effectively implemented and how their failure to materialize can negatively impact our civilizing process, hindering progress towards a society that truly respects diversity and inclusivity.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-04T15:07:58Z
2023-07-04T16:16:25Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-04T15:07:58Z
2023-07-04T16:16:25Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023-05-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867/25130
https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/194432
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202301.003
url https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867/25130
https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/194432
https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202301.003
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv urn:issn:2304-4322
urn:issn:1019-9403
dc.rights.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv PE
dc.source.es_ES.fl_str_mv Educación; Vol. 32 Núm. 62 (2023)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:PUCP-Institucional
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str PUCP-Institucional
collection PUCP-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la PUCP
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@pucp.pe
_version_ 1835638715299397632
spelling Hora, JúnioBazilatto, AlexandrePantaleão, Edson2023-07-04T15:07:58Z2023-07-04T16:16:25Z2023-07-04T15:07:58Z2023-07-04T16:16:25Z2023-05-18https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867/25130https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/194432https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202301.003The purpose of this essay is to analyze legal proposals and public policies related to the entry and permanence of students with special educational needs in higher education, within a Latin American context that includes Mexico and Brazil. To conduct a comparative study, we use a historical-documentary methodology that examines educational legislation and its impact on public policies between 1996 and 2018. Our theoretical perspective is based on the concept of Civilizing Processes, as developed by Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011). This perspective emphasizes how societies utilize social relations between different groups to form their constitution and interdependence processes, which in turn impact the actions of individuals as well as the state institutions that govern them. The data we present in this essay show that Mexico and Brazil have established legal frameworks that recognize the rights of students with special educational needs to access higher education. However, we also question the extent to which these legal documents are effectively implemented and how their failure to materialize can negatively impact our civilizing process, hindering progress towards a society that truly respects diversity and inclusivity.El propósito de este ensayo es analizar las propuestas legales y sus políticas públicas para el ingreso y estadía de estudiantes con discapacidad en Educación Superior, en un contexto latinoamericano entre México y Brasil. Para un estudio comparativo nos basamos en la metodología histórico-documental sobre la legislación educativa que marcó las políticas públicas entre 1996 y 2018. La perspectiva teórica se basa en la idea de procesos civilizadores, desarrollada por Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011), destacando que las sociedades utilizan para su constitución un conjunto de relaciones entre individuos y grupos sociales, cuyos procesos de interdependencia configuran las figuraciones humanas y sus acciones en paralelo a los Estados en los que estas figuras la componen. Los datos demuestran que México y Brasil están en condiciones de contemplar legalmente el acceso de las personas con discapacidad en la Educación Superior. Lo que hemos cuestionado es sobre la aplicabilidad de estos documentos legales y la medida en que su falta de materialización impacta nuestro proceso civilizador y la mejora de la condición humana que respeta las diferencias.O ensaio analisa legislações e políticas públicas para estudantes público-alvo da Educação Especial na Educação Superior, em contexto latino-americano entre México e Brasil. Para um estudo comparado, baseamo-nos na metodologia histórico-documental trabalhando legislações educacionais entre 1996 e 2018. A perspectiva teórica dos Processos Civilizadores, por Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011), destacando um conjunto das relações entre indivíduos e grupos sociais para sua constituição, cujos processos de interdependência formam as figurações humanas e suas ações em paralelo aos Estados em que essas figurações compõem. Os dados demonstram que México e o Brasil contemplam legalmente o acesso de estudantes público-alvo da Educação Especial à Educação Superior. Questionamos sobre a aplicabilidade desses documentos e em que medida a não concretização impacta no Processo Civilizador e aprimoramento do respeito às diferenças.application/pdfporPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúPEurn:issn:2304-4322urn:issn:1019-9403info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Educación; Vol. 32 Núm. 62 (2023)reponame:PUCP-Institucionalinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPSpecial educationHigher educationLegislationPublic policyComparative studyEducación especialEducación superiorLegislaciónPolíticas públicasEstudio comparativoEducação especialEducação superiorLegislaçãoPolíticas públicasEstudo comparadohttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación SuperiorPublic laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher EducationLegislações e políticas públicas: um estudo comparado internacional em Educação Especial na Educação Superiorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo20.500.14657/194432oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/1944322024-11-05 16:54:17.863https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessmetadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.pucp.edu.peRepositorio Institucional de la PUCPrepositorio@pucp.pe
score 13.92416
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).