Propuestas de lege ferenda desarrolladas en el derecho penal alemán para sancionar a los directivos de empresas que no evitan delitos de subordinados

• Autores: Contreras Chaimovich, Lautaro Camilo, Couso Salas, Jaime Rodolfo
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/205197
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/30858/28179; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/205197; https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202502.001
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Corporate criminal law; Criminal intervention in business; Guarantor’s position of company executives; Duty to intervene; Duty of supervision; Derecho penal de la empresa; Intervención delictiva en la empresa; Posición de garante de los directivos; Deber de intervención; Deberes de vigilancia; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

Commission by omission presents important difficulties as a mechanism to penalize corporate management bodies that violate their duties of organization, instruction, supervision or intervention. These difficulties are related to the legal requirements in terms of (quasi-)causality and intent. To overcome these obstacles, a sector of German criminal doctrine has proposed different alternatives de lege ferenda—in the form of criminal types different from those of improper omission—to punish the infringement of the aforementioned duties. The purpose of this article is to explain and critically assess these proposals.